• DocumentCode
    2605116
  • Title

    Defect coverage of boundary-scan tests: what does it mean when a boundary-scan test passes?

  • Author

    Parker, Kenneth P.

  • Author_Institution
    Agilent Technol., Loveland, CO, USA
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    30 Sept.-2 Oct. 2003
  • Firstpage
    181
  • Abstract
    A new coverage definition and metric, called the \´PCOLA/SOQ" model, introduced in K. Hird et al. (2002), has great utility in allowing the test coverage of defects on boards to be measured and compared rationally. This paper discusses the general topic of measuring test coverage of boundary-scan tests within this framework. A conclusion is that boundary-scan tests offer a large amount of test coverage when boundary-scan is implemented on a board, even if that implementation is partial. However, coverage is not perfect for certain defects in the PCOLA/SOQ model, as shown by example.
  • Keywords
    boundary scan testing; integrated circuit interconnections; integrated circuit testing; printed circuit testing; PCOLA/SOQ model; boundary-scan tests; coverage definition; defect coverage; test coverage; Bills of materials; Connectors; Inductors; Integrated circuit testing; Mechanical factors; Pins; Polarization; Resistors; Soldering; System testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Test Conference, 2003. Proceedings. ITC 2003. International
  • ISSN
    1089-3539
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8106-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/TEST.2003.1271208
  • Filename
    1271208