• DocumentCode
    2610038
  • Title

    A comparison between hybrid methods for open-boundary problems

  • Author

    Aiello, G. ; Alfonzetti, S. ; Rizzo, S.A. ; Salerno, N.

  • Author_Institution
    Dipt. di Ing. Elettr., Elettron. e dei Sist. (DIEES), Univ. di Catania, Catania, Italy
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    9-12 May 2010
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    1
  • Abstract
    This paper compares the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary electrostatic field problems. Both methods couple a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one. The comparison shows that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time.
  • Keywords
    boundary-elements methods; differential equations; electric fields; finite element analysis; integral equations; FEM-DBCI method; differential equation; hybrid FEM-BEM method; integral equation; interior problem; open-boundary electrostatic field problems; Boundary conditions; Boundary element methods; Conductors; Differential equations; Electromagnetic fields; Electrostatics; Finite element methods; Integral equations; Poisson equations; Skin effect;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC), 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Chicago, IL
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-7059-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471
  • Filename
    5481471