• DocumentCode
    2616304
  • Title

    A Performance Comparison of Mobile WiMAX Spectrums: 2.5 GHz vs. 3.65 GHz

  • Author

    Shrestha, Pradhumna Lal ; Hempel, Michael ; Mahasukhon, Puttipong ; Ma, Tao ; Sharif, Hamid

  • Author_Institution
    Comput. & Electron. Eng. Dept., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha, NE, USA
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    6-9 May 2012
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    5
  • Abstract
    Mobile WiMAX is a popular broadband solution with diverse applications. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) currently issues licenses for Mobile WiMAX in several frequency bands, of which 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz are the most prevalent. A significant amount of research has been conducted in the domain of 2.5 GHz due to its widespread commercial use. However, no such work - academic or industrial - has been reported for 3.65 GHz, in spite of it being a more favorable option for many applications, particularly because of its licensing requirements. In this paper, we present a comprehensive comparison of these two frequency bands in order to provide benchmark results for use by network planners, engineers and researchers. Our analysis indicates that, while 2.5 GHz Mobile WiMAX generally offers a larger coverage area, the attractive licensing options for 3.65 GHz may present an interesting alternative for many deployment scenarios and applications.
  • Keywords
    WiMax; broadband networks; mobile communication; FCC; Federal Communications Commission; United States; broadband solution; frequency 2.5 GHz; frequency 3.65 GHz; licensing requirements; mobile WiMAX spectrums; performance comparison; Broadband communication; Downlink; Mobile communication; Performance evaluation; Testing; Throughput; WiMAX;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2012 IEEE 75th
  • Conference_Location
    Yokohama
  • ISSN
    1550-2252
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-0989-9
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1550-2252
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/VETECS.2012.6240329
  • Filename
    6240329