Clean coal technology

Author

Batkhuyag, S. ; Davaakhuu, Sh.

Author_Institution

Power Eng. Sch., Mongolian Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Ulaanbataar

fYear

2008

fDate

23-29 June 2008

Firstpage

507

Lastpage

510

Abstract

The paper compared pulverized coal (PC), circulating fluidized bed (CFB), and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC). These baseload PC, CFB, and IGCC technologies comprise the clean coal options available for consideration to meet Mongolian electricity generation expansion project needs in the 2012 to 2014 time period. This paper provides technology descriptions, plant descriptions, and screening level estimates of performance, capital costs, and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for the various power generation technologies considered. Performance and cost estimates were based on assumptions made by Black & Veatch, in conjunction with Florida Power & Light (FPL), for site and ambient conditions, cycle arrangements, air quality control systems (AQCS), and analysis of the proposed fuel.

Keywords

air pollution control; power generation economics; steam power stations; Florida Power & Light; Mongolian electricity generation expansion project; air quality control systems; capital costs; circulating fluidized bed; clean coal technology; integrated gasification combined cycle; operations and maintenance costs; plant descriptions; pulverized coal; screening level estimates; technology descriptions; Boilers; Costs; Educational institutions; Fuels; Paper technology; Power engineering; Power generation; Power generation economics; Production; Turbines;

fLanguage

English

Publisher

ieee

Conference_Titel

Strategic Technologies, 2008. IFOST 2008. Third International Forum on

Conference_Location

Novosibirsk-Tomsk

Print_ISBN

978-1-4244-2319-4

Electronic_ISBN

978-1-4244-2320-0

Type

conf

DOI

10.1109/IFOST.2008.4602857

Filename

4602857