• DocumentCode
    2652464
  • Title

    Comparison about the Three Central Composite Designs with Simulation

  • Author

    Zhang, Zhihong ; Bai Xiaofeng

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Accounting, Shandong Economic Univ., Jinan
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    22-24 Jan. 2009
  • Firstpage
    163
  • Lastpage
    167
  • Abstract
    A comparative study of the three important Central Composite Designs(CCDs) in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was presented. The three CCDs are Central Composite Circumscribed design (CCC), Central Composite Inscribed design(CCI) and Central Composite Face-centred design (CCF). Characteristics of the three designs were analyzed and guide lines were provided with some key concepts about CCDs. Then evaluation and comparison were made among CCC, CCI and CCF from the view of region of interest and robustness of design through simulation of a motor assembly. The results show that effective experiment of design cannot be gained without correct selection of CCC, CCI and CCF. Lastly, the guidelines for selecting CCDs were given. This study will provide better foundation for practice applications.
  • Keywords
    design; response surface methodology; central composite circumscribed design; central composite design; central composite face-centred design; central composite inscribed design; motor assembly; response surface methodology; Assembly; Centralized control; Computational modeling; Computer simulation; Economic forecasting; Guidelines; Predictive models; Radiofrequency interference; Response surface methodology; Robustness; CCC; CCF; CCI; RSM; Robustness;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Advanced Computer Control, 2009. ICACC '09. International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Singapore
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-3330-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICACC.2009.48
  • Filename
    4777329