DocumentCode :
2652464
Title :
Comparison about the Three Central Composite Designs with Simulation
Author :
Zhang, Zhihong ; Bai Xiaofeng
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Accounting, Shandong Economic Univ., Jinan
fYear :
2009
fDate :
22-24 Jan. 2009
Firstpage :
163
Lastpage :
167
Abstract :
A comparative study of the three important Central Composite Designs(CCDs) in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was presented. The three CCDs are Central Composite Circumscribed design (CCC), Central Composite Inscribed design(CCI) and Central Composite Face-centred design (CCF). Characteristics of the three designs were analyzed and guide lines were provided with some key concepts about CCDs. Then evaluation and comparison were made among CCC, CCI and CCF from the view of region of interest and robustness of design through simulation of a motor assembly. The results show that effective experiment of design cannot be gained without correct selection of CCC, CCI and CCF. Lastly, the guidelines for selecting CCDs were given. This study will provide better foundation for practice applications.
Keywords :
design; response surface methodology; central composite circumscribed design; central composite design; central composite face-centred design; central composite inscribed design; motor assembly; response surface methodology; Assembly; Centralized control; Computational modeling; Computer simulation; Economic forecasting; Guidelines; Predictive models; Radiofrequency interference; Response surface methodology; Robustness; CCC; CCF; CCI; RSM; Robustness;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Advanced Computer Control, 2009. ICACC '09. International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Singapore
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-3330-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICACC.2009.48
Filename :
4777329
Link To Document :
بازگشت