DocumentCode
2652464
Title
Comparison about the Three Central Composite Designs with Simulation
Author
Zhang, Zhihong ; Bai Xiaofeng
Author_Institution
Sch. of Accounting, Shandong Economic Univ., Jinan
fYear
2009
fDate
22-24 Jan. 2009
Firstpage
163
Lastpage
167
Abstract
A comparative study of the three important Central Composite Designs(CCDs) in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was presented. The three CCDs are Central Composite Circumscribed design (CCC), Central Composite Inscribed design(CCI) and Central Composite Face-centred design (CCF). Characteristics of the three designs were analyzed and guide lines were provided with some key concepts about CCDs. Then evaluation and comparison were made among CCC, CCI and CCF from the view of region of interest and robustness of design through simulation of a motor assembly. The results show that effective experiment of design cannot be gained without correct selection of CCC, CCI and CCF. Lastly, the guidelines for selecting CCDs were given. This study will provide better foundation for practice applications.
Keywords
design; response surface methodology; central composite circumscribed design; central composite design; central composite face-centred design; central composite inscribed design; motor assembly; response surface methodology; Assembly; Centralized control; Computational modeling; Computer simulation; Economic forecasting; Guidelines; Predictive models; Radiofrequency interference; Response surface methodology; Robustness; CCC; CCF; CCI; RSM; Robustness;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Advanced Computer Control, 2009. ICACC '09. International Conference on
Conference_Location
Singapore
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-3330-8
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICACC.2009.48
Filename
4777329
Link To Document