• DocumentCode
    2652620
  • Title

    Plasma atomic layer etching

  • Author

    Agarwal, Ankur ; Kushner, Mark J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Chem & Biomolecular Eng., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    4-8 June 2006
  • Firstpage
    469
  • Lastpage
    469
  • Abstract
    Summary form only given. The thinning of the dielectric in the metal (and non-metal) gate stacks and the need to resolve etching on an atomic layer basis present large technological challenges. Conventional plasma processes which utilize reactive ion etching typically do not have sufficient controllability to achieve atomic layer resolution and to avoid damage. To ensure atomic-level control it is desirable to use a self-limiting process which is independent of the process time. This self-limited etching can be described as layer-by-layer etching or atomic layer etching. Plasma atomic layer etching (PALE) is a methodology similar to plasma atomic layer deposition. In PALE, formation of a monolayer of reactants is followed by the removal of the layer that then self terminates the process. For example, deposition of a thin layer of polymer or passivation followed by etching in a non-polymerizing plasma with low energy ion energy could remove only a single layer or less of underlying material. The higher threshold energy required to remove the underlying material in the absence of the passivation would self-terminate the process. The challenge is to perform these processes in conventional plasma equipment as opposed to expensive and highly specialized beam equipment. In this paper, results from a computational investigation of PALE will be discussed with the goal of demonstrating the potential of using conventional plasma etching equipment. The hybrid plasma equipment model (HPEM) and the Monte Carlo feature profile model (MCFPM) were modified to have pulse periodic capability as required for PALE, and to kinetically resolve ion energy distributions to finely resolve threshold energies. Results will be discussed for at least two systems: 1) PALE of Si using steps of an Ar/Cl2 plasma (passivation) followed by Ar plasma (etch) and 2) PALE of SiO2 using steps of a fluorocarbon plasma (passivation) followed by an Ar plasma (etch)
  • Keywords
    Monte Carlo methods; elemental semiconductors; passivation; plasma materials processing; silicon; silicon compounds; sputter etching; Monte Carlo feature profile model; Si; SiO2; dielectric thinning; fluorocarbon plasma; hybrid plasma equipment model; ion energy distributions; metal gate stacks; passivation; plasma atomic layer etching; polymer; reactant monolayer; reactive ion etching; Argon; Atomic layer deposition; Controllability; Dielectrics; Energy resolution; Etching; Passivation; Plasma applications; Plasma materials processing; Polymers;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Plasma Science, 2006. ICOPS 2006. IEEE Conference Record - Abstracts. The 33rd IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Traverse City, MI
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0125-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PLASMA.2006.1707342
  • Filename
    1707342