DocumentCode :
2652620
Title :
Plasma atomic layer etching
Author :
Agarwal, Ankur ; Kushner, Mark J.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Chem & Biomolecular Eng., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL
fYear :
2006
fDate :
4-8 June 2006
Firstpage :
469
Lastpage :
469
Abstract :
Summary form only given. The thinning of the dielectric in the metal (and non-metal) gate stacks and the need to resolve etching on an atomic layer basis present large technological challenges. Conventional plasma processes which utilize reactive ion etching typically do not have sufficient controllability to achieve atomic layer resolution and to avoid damage. To ensure atomic-level control it is desirable to use a self-limiting process which is independent of the process time. This self-limited etching can be described as layer-by-layer etching or atomic layer etching. Plasma atomic layer etching (PALE) is a methodology similar to plasma atomic layer deposition. In PALE, formation of a monolayer of reactants is followed by the removal of the layer that then self terminates the process. For example, deposition of a thin layer of polymer or passivation followed by etching in a non-polymerizing plasma with low energy ion energy could remove only a single layer or less of underlying material. The higher threshold energy required to remove the underlying material in the absence of the passivation would self-terminate the process. The challenge is to perform these processes in conventional plasma equipment as opposed to expensive and highly specialized beam equipment. In this paper, results from a computational investigation of PALE will be discussed with the goal of demonstrating the potential of using conventional plasma etching equipment. The hybrid plasma equipment model (HPEM) and the Monte Carlo feature profile model (MCFPM) were modified to have pulse periodic capability as required for PALE, and to kinetically resolve ion energy distributions to finely resolve threshold energies. Results will be discussed for at least two systems: 1) PALE of Si using steps of an Ar/Cl2 plasma (passivation) followed by Ar plasma (etch) and 2) PALE of SiO2 using steps of a fluorocarbon plasma (passivation) followed by an Ar plasma (etch)
Keywords :
Monte Carlo methods; elemental semiconductors; passivation; plasma materials processing; silicon; silicon compounds; sputter etching; Monte Carlo feature profile model; Si; SiO2; dielectric thinning; fluorocarbon plasma; hybrid plasma equipment model; ion energy distributions; metal gate stacks; passivation; plasma atomic layer etching; polymer; reactant monolayer; reactive ion etching; Argon; Atomic layer deposition; Controllability; Dielectrics; Energy resolution; Etching; Passivation; Plasma applications; Plasma materials processing; Polymers;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Plasma Science, 2006. ICOPS 2006. IEEE Conference Record - Abstracts. The 33rd IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Traverse City, MI
Print_ISBN :
1-4244-0125-9
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/PLASMA.2006.1707342
Filename :
1707342
Link To Document :
بازگشت