DocumentCode
2656421
Title
Crossing the Real Chasm in Technical Development Work
Author
Sterling, S.Revi ; Bennett, John K.
Author_Institution
ATLAS Inst., Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
fYear
2011
fDate
Oct. 30 2011-Nov. 1 2011
Firstpage
328
Lastpage
331
Abstract
The history of humanitarian technology is replete with mismatched expectations between the practitioner and the community intended to benefit from the provided technology. Recent work examining the failures that result from this mismatch shows promise, but few actionable recommendations for closing the chasm between practitioner and community have emerged. There are frameworks and checklists to help promote "correct" community engagement, but these typically require the technologist to be as well-versed in social science methodologies as technology. While this combination is at the core of a handful of academic programs, the majority of humanitarian technologists do not have the time or resources to learn relevant social science theory and practice. From practical experience and research, we suggest five strategies and corresponding tactics to help address this problem.
Keywords
research and development; social sciences; community engagement; humanitarian technology; practitioner-community chasm; social science methodology; technical development work; Communities; Conferences; Diseases; Educational institutions; History; Lead; community development; humanitarian technology;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 2011 IEEE
Conference_Location
Seattle, WA
Print_ISBN
978-1-61284-634-7
Electronic_ISBN
978-0-7695-4595-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/GHTC.2011.66
Filename
6103659
Link To Document