Title :
The effect of various straining maneuvers on cardiac volumes at 1 G and during +Gz acceleration
Author :
Tripp, Lloyd ; Jennings, Tom ; Howell, Lora ; Seaworth, John ; Ratino, David ; Goodyear, Chuck
Author_Institution :
Harry G. Armstrong Aerosp. Med. Res. Lab., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
Abstract :
The effects of Valsalva (Val), isometric contraction (Iso), and the L-1 maneuvers (L-1) on cardiac volumes at 1 G and during 4 G were evaluated. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure volumes. In the 1 G phase, eight seated male subjects performed the three maneuvers. The end-diastolic volume (EDV) decreased during VAL and L-1 (p 0.05). EDV decreased initially, but then returned to baseline with Iso. In the 4 G phase, seven male subjects experienced three 30 second 4 G epochs while performing the three maneuvers. During 4 G, 3 of 7 performing Val, 2 of 7 performing Iso, and none performing L-1 experienced peripheral light loss. EDV decreased and stabilized below baseline during the 4 Gz epoch (p 0.05). Heart rate and cardiac output increased for all maneuvers. Differences between the effects of Val, Iso, and L-1 on G-tolerance do not appear to be related to a differential ability to maintain cardiac volumes. L-1 must provide more G protection due to the isometric contraction component of the maneuver and its ability to increase blood pressure
Keywords :
aerospace biophysics; aerospace testing; biomedical measurement; cardiology; haemodynamics; human factors; military systems; +Gz acceleration; 1 G phase; 2D; 4 G phase; G-tolerance; L-1 maneuvers; Valsalva; blood pressure; cardiac output; cardiac volumes; echocardiography; end-diastolic volume; heart rate; isometric contraction; straining maneuvers; Acceleration; Aircraft; Biomedical engineering; Blood pressure; Echocardiography; Laboratories; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Protection; Volume measurement;
Conference_Titel :
Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1990. NAECON 1990., Proceedings of the IEEE 1990 National
Conference_Location :
Dayton, OH
DOI :
10.1109/NAECON.1990.112877