DocumentCode :
2670931
Title :
Cable Ampacity Calculations: A Comparison of Methods
Author :
Bates, Carson ; Malmedal, Keith ; Cain, David
Author_Institution :
NEI Electr. Power Eng., Arvada, CO, USA
fYear :
2015
fDate :
19-21 April 2015
Firstpage :
81
Lastpage :
87
Abstract :
When designing electrical power systems, it is often necessary to determine underground cable ampacity. Various methods are in use today including computer simulation, ampacity tables, and a method that has recently been suggested that includes the effects of moisture migration through soil. Each of these methods can yield substantially different ampacity results for the same installation. Regardless of the method, using the correct value of soil thermal resistivity is critical and using the wrong value can result in cables that are incorrectly sized. This paper examines several commonly used methods and their underlying assumptions. Examples are provided to illustrate the differences in the results obtained from various methods and the consequences of using incorrect assumptions. It is hoped that these examples will provide guidance on the implementation of each method.
Keywords :
power cables; soil; thermal conductivity; underground cables; ampacity tables; computer simulation; electrical power systems; moisture migration; soil thermal resistivity; underground cable ampacity calculations; Cable shielding; Conductivity; Moisture; Power cables; Soil; Thermal resistance; Water heating; cable ampacity; power cable installation; power distribution; soil thermal resistivity; soil thermal stability; solar power generation; underground power distribution lines; underground power transmission lines; wind power generation;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC), 2015 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Asheville, NC
ISSN :
0734-7464
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4799-7555-6
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/REPC.2015.13
Filename :
7106314
Link To Document :
بازگشت