• DocumentCode
    2703024
  • Title

    Australian software development: what software project management practices lead to success?

  • Author

    Verner, J.M. ; Cerpa, N.

  • Author_Institution
    Nat. ICT Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    29 March-1 April 2005
  • Firstpage
    70
  • Lastpage
    77
  • Abstract
    We surveyed a number of Australian software practitioners in order to understand what software development practices were used in their recent software projects. We were particularly interested to discover what project management practices are common in Australian software projects. The relationship between practices and software project outcomes enables us to investigate why some projects succeed and others fail. We found that nearly 20% of projects had no lifecycle methodology and 10% of our respondents did not understand what was meant by a software development lifecycle methodology. Many recognized software practices are not being applied consistently in the projects investigated. Fifty percent of projects began with unclear requirements. Risk assessment is not normally a part of the development process and the organizations are not learning from their mistakes as post mortem reviews are much more likely to be held for successful projects than they are for unsuccessful projects.
  • Keywords
    project management; software development management; Australian software development lifecycle methodology; software project management; Australia; Costs; Pharmaceuticals; Programming; Project management; Risk management; Scheduling; Software development management; Software engineering; Software maintenance;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Software Engineering Conference, 2005. Proceedings. 2005 Australian
  • ISSN
    1530-0803
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7695-2257-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ASWEC.2005.14
  • Filename
    1402002