DocumentCode
2710821
Title
Bringing science into the courtroom
Author
Utt, David P.
Author_Institution
Fire Forensics & Safety Consulting LLC, Carmel, IN, USA
fYear
2009
fDate
26-28 Oct. 2009
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
9
Abstract
While investigators have adequate tools for ensuring they reach a proper determination of fire causation, claims against manufacturers often progress to the courtroom despite forensic analysis indicating their products are not at fault. A solid defense strategy requires a reasonable alternative explanation grounded in scientific principles. Because the complexities of science may sometimes be lost on lay people and jurors, the use of visual and demonstrative materials can effectively convey these concepts.
Keywords
forensic science; law; scientific information systems; alternative explanation; courtroom; fire causation; forensic analysis; jurors; lay people; scientific principles; solid defense strategy; Catalogs; Fires; Forensics; Manufacturing; Materials requirements planning; Product safety; Solids; Strips; Surges; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Product Compliance Engineering, 2009. PSES 2009. IEEE Symposium on
Conference_Location
Toronto, ON
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-3305-6
Electronic_ISBN
978-1-4244-3306-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PSES.2009.5356013
Filename
5356013
Link To Document