DocumentCode :
2720064
Title :
Detailed Control Room Design Reviews-were they worth the effort?
Author :
Feher, Mark P.
Author_Institution :
Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River, Ont., Canada
fYear :
1997
fDate :
8-13 Jun 1997
Firstpage :
42451
Lastpage :
42455
Abstract :
In order to consider the issue of the Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) it is appropriate to pose a series of questions to provide context and a framework to the discussion: What was the nature of experience with DCRDRs? What was the general approach taken to perform the work? What were the findings from the work? What resulted from the findings? Was the DCRDR a useful tool? What were the positive factors? What were the negative factors? The author answers these questions with particular reference to CANDU
Keywords :
control facilities; nuclear power stations; power station control; CANDU; Detailed Control Room Design Reviews; negative factors; nuclear power stations; positive factors; Alarm systems; Design engineering; Displays; Engineering management; Human factors; Labeling; Management training; Personnel; Process design; Standards development;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Human Factors and Power Plants, 1997. Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation., Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on
Conference_Location :
Orlando, FL
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-3769-7
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/HFPP.1997.624821
Filename :
624821
Link To Document :
بازگشت