DocumentCode :
2721965
Title :
Computer-aided prognosis: Predicting patient and disease outcome via multi-modal image analysis
Author :
Madabhushi, Anant ; Basavanhally, Ajay ; Doyle, Scott ; Agner, Shannon ; Lee, George
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Rutgers Univ., Piscataway, NJ, USA
fYear :
2010
fDate :
14-17 April 2010
Firstpage :
1415
Lastpage :
1418
Abstract :
Computer-aided prognosis (CAP) is a new and exciting complement to the field of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and involves developing computerized image analysis and multi-modal data fusion algorithms for helping physicians predict disease outcome and patient survival. At the Laboratory for Computational Imaging and Bioinformatics (LCIB) at Rutgers University we have been developing computerized algorithms for high dimensional data and image analysis for predicting disease outcome from multiple modalities including MRI, digital pathology, and protein expression. Additionally, we have been developing novel data fusion algorithms based on nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods (such as Graph Embedding) to quantitatively integrate prognostic information from multiple data sources and modalities. In this paper, we briefly describe 5 representative and ongoing CAP projects at LCIB. These projects include (1) an Image-based Risk Score (IbRiS) algorithm for predicting outcome of ER+ breast cancer patients based on quantitative image analysis of digitized breast cancer biopsy specimens alone, (2) segmenting and determining extent of lymphocytic infiltration (identified as a possible prognostic marker for outcome in Her2+ breast cancers) from digitized histopathology, (3) segmenting and diagnosing highly agressive triple-negative breast cancers on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, (4) distinguishing patients with different Gleason grades of prostate cancer (grade being known to be correlated to outcome) from digitized needle biopsy specimens, and (5) integrating protein expression measurements obtained from mass spectrometry with quantitative image features derived from digitized histopathology for distinguishing between prostate cancer patients at low and high risk of disease recurrence.
Keywords :
CAD; biological organs; biomedical MRI; cancer; cellular biophysics; feature extraction; gynaecology; image segmentation; mass spectroscopy; medical image processing; proteins; proteomics; sensor fusion; tumours; CAP; DCE MRI; ER+ breast cancer; Gleason grade; Her2+ breast cancer; IbRiS; LCIB; MRI; computer-aided diagnosis; computer-aided prognosis; computerized image analysis; digital pathology; digitized histopathology; digitzed needle biopsy; disease outcome; disease recurrence; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; graph embedding; image-based risk score; laboratory for computational imaging and bioinformatics; lymphocytic infiltration; mass spectrometry; multimodal data fusion; multimodal image analysis; nonlinear dimensionality reduction; patient survival; personalized medicine; prostate cancer; protein expression; triple-negative breast cancer; Breast biopsy; Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis; Coronary arteriosclerosis; Diseases; Image analysis; Image segmentation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Physics computing; Prostate cancer; MRI; breast cancer; computer-aided prognosis (CAP); data fusion; digital pathology; multi-modal; personalized medicine; prostate cancer;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Rotterdam
ISSN :
1945-7928
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4125-9
Electronic_ISBN :
1945-7928
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ISBI.2010.5490264
Filename :
5490264
Link To Document :
بازگشت