• DocumentCode
    2754606
  • Title

    Are ARIMA neural network hybrids better than single models?

  • Author

    Taskaya-Temizel, T. ; Ahmad, K.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput., Surrey Univ., Guildford, UK
  • Volume
    5
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    31 July-4 Aug. 2005
  • Firstpage
    3192
  • Abstract
    Hybrid methods comprising autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and neural network models are generally favored against single neural network and single ARIMA models in the literature. The benefits of such methods appear to be substantial especially when dealing with non-stationary series: nonstationary linear component can be modeled using ARIMA and nonlinear component using neural networks. Our studies suggest that the use of a nonlinear component may degenerate the performance of such hybrids and that a simpler hybrid comprising linear AR model with a TDNN outperforms the more complex hybrid in tests on benchmark economic and financial time series.
  • Keywords
    autoregressive moving average processes; neural nets; time series; ARIMA neural network hybrid; TDNN; autoregressive integrated moving average; economic time series; financial time series; neural network model; nonlinear component; nonstationary linear component; single ARIMA model; single neural network; Benchmark testing; Chaos; Computer networks; Economic forecasting; Electronic mail; Feedforward neural networks; Merging; Neural networks; Piecewise linear techniques; Statistics;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Neural Networks, 2005. IJCNN '05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-9048-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IJCNN.2005.1556438
  • Filename
    1556438