DocumentCode :
2790122
Title :
The ameliorating effects of accountability on automation bias
Author :
Burdick, Mark D. ; Skitka, Linda J. ; Mosier, Kathleen L. ; Heers, Susan
Author_Institution :
Illinois Univ., Chicago, IL, USA
fYear :
1996
fDate :
25-28 Aug 1996
Firstpage :
142
Abstract :
Recent research indicates that automated decision aids introduced into the workplace with the express purpose of reducing human error may have the paradoxical effect of simply changing the types of errors made. This series of studies documents a possible “automation bias” and uses the concept of social accountability as a “debiasing” intervention with two sample populations. Results indicate that subjects who perceived themselves as accountable for their accuracy or performance were significantly less likely to fall victim to automation bias in a simulated cockpit environment
Keywords :
aerospace expert systems; decision support systems; human factors; man-machine systems; accountability; automated decision aids; automation bias; debiasing intervention; simulated cockpit environment; social accountability; Aerospace simulation; Automation; Biological system modeling; Costs; Employment; Humans; Information processing; Multidimensional systems; NASA; Psychology;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Human Interaction with Complex Systems, 1996. HICS '96. Proceedings., Third Annual Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Dayton, OH
Print_ISBN :
0-8186-7493-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/HUICS.1996.549504
Filename :
549504
Link To Document :
بازگشت