DocumentCode :
281697
Title :
Superiority of LMS over RLS for tracking a chirped signal
Author :
Macchi, Odile ; Bershad, Neil
fYear :
1989
fDate :
32589
Firstpage :
42401
Lastpage :
42406
Abstract :
When an adaptive filter, receiving coloured inputs, has to track a nonstationary environment, it is often said that the RLS algorithm will outperform the LMS one because it is known to converge faster. However, convergence speed is a transient property, independent of the amount of noise, while tracking is a steady-state performance and is therefore also influenced by the noise level. The answer is not obvious. There is in fact no single answer, and it depends very much on the problem under consideration. It has already been proved that LMS can be superior in a context where the optimal filter W0(k) to be tracked is a zero-mean random function of time. The case where W0(k) has deterministic time variation is considered
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
iet
Conference_Titel :
Adaptive Filters, IEE Colloquium on
Conference_Location :
London
Type :
conf
Filename :
198100
Link To Document :
بازگشت