DocumentCode
2817841
Title
Theoretical Performance Comparison: Closed- vs Open-Loop Bearing Estimation, Using Phase
Author
Bartram, James F.
Author_Institution
Submarine Signal Div. Portsmouth, Raytheon Co., Portsmouth, RI, USA
fYear
1981
fDate
16-18 Sept. 1981
Firstpage
971
Lastpage
975
Abstract
Two basic approaches to the problem of estimating bearing in the ocean are compared. These approaches, both of which utilize signal phase, rather than amplitude, information, are the traditional closed-loop method and a newer open-loop concept. The relative theoretical performance is determined in terms of the standard deviation of fluctuation in the bearing estimate, normalized for universality. Bias considerations are neglected for simplicity. When the resulting closed- and open-loop performance curves are compared, it is found that there is little difference between them at high signal-to-noise ratios.
Keywords
closed loop systems; direction-of-arrival estimation; open loop systems; Bias considerations; closed loop bearing estimation; open loop bearing estimation; signal to noise ratios; theoretical performance comparison; Acoustic beams; Bandwidth; Direction of arrival estimation; Fluctuations; Oceans; Phase estimation; Phased arrays; Sea measurements; Signal to noise ratio; Underwater vehicles;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
OCEANS 81
Conference_Location
Boston, MA
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/OCEANS.1981.1151554
Filename
1151554
Link To Document