DocumentCode :
2825591
Title :
Comparison of wafer-level spatial IDDQ estimation methods: NNR versus NCR
Author :
Sabade, Saga S. ; Walker, D.M.H.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX, USA
fYear :
2004
fDate :
38102
Firstpage :
17
Lastpage :
22
Abstract :
Extending the useful life of IDDQ test to deep submicron technologies has been a topic of interest in recent years. IDDQ test loses its effectiveness as the signal to noise ratio degrades due to rising background current and fault-free IDDQ variance. Defect detection using IDDQ test requires separation of deterministic sources of variation from defective current. Several methods that use deterministic variation in IDDQ at the wafer level for estimating fault-free IDDQ of a chip are proposed. This paper compares two such methods: nearest neighbor residual (NNR) and neighbor current ratio (NCR). These methods are evaluated using industrial test data for a recent technology.
Keywords :
integrated circuit testing; parameter estimation; IDDQ testing; background current; deep submicron technology; defect detection; defective current; deterministic sources; deterministic variation; fault-free IDDQ estimation; fault-free IDDQ variance; industrial test data; nearest neighbor residual; neighbor current ratio; signal to noise ratio; spatial correlation; wafer-level spatial IDDQ estimation methods; Computer science; Degradation; Equations; Fault diagnosis; Joining processes; Life testing; Logic; Nearest neighbor searches; Signal to noise ratio;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Current and Defect Based Testing, 2004. DBT 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Workshop on
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-8950-6
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/DBT.2004.1408947
Filename :
1408947
Link To Document :
بازگشت