• DocumentCode
    2826088
  • Title

    Reasons not to deploy RED

  • Author

    May, Michael ; Bolot, Jean ; Diot, Christophe ; Lyles, Bryan

  • Author_Institution
    INRIA, France
  • fYear
    1999
  • fDate
    1999
  • Firstpage
    260
  • Lastpage
    262
  • Abstract
    In this paper we examine the benefits of random early detection (RED) by using a testbed made of two commercially available routers and up to 16 PCs to observe RED performance under a traffic load made of FTP transfers, together with HTTP traffic and non-responsive UDP flows. The main results we found were, first, that RED with small buffers does not improve significantly the performance of the network, in particular the overall throughput is smaller than with tail drop and the difference in delay is not significant. Second, parameter tuning in RED remains an inexact science, but has no big impact on the end-to-end performance. We argue that RED deployment is not straightforward, and we strongly recommend more research with realistic network settings to develop a full quantitative understanding of RED. Nevertheless, RED allows us to control the queue size with large buffers
  • Keywords
    buffer storage; delays; queueing theory; telecommunication equipment testing; telecommunication network routing; telecommunication traffic; transport protocols; FTP transfers; HTTP traffic; PC; RED; buffers; delay; network performance; non-responsive UDP flows; parameter tuning; queue size control; random early detection; routers; testbed; traffic load; Communication system traffic control; Feedback; Internet; Personal communication networks; Size control; Tail; Telecommunication traffic; Testing; Throughput; Traffic control;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Quality of Service, 1999. IWQoS '99. 1999 Seventh International Workshop on
  • Conference_Location
    London
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-5671-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IWQOS.1999.766502
  • Filename
    766502