DocumentCode :
2826088
Title :
Reasons not to deploy RED
Author :
May, Michael ; Bolot, Jean ; Diot, Christophe ; Lyles, Bryan
Author_Institution :
INRIA, France
fYear :
1999
fDate :
1999
Firstpage :
260
Lastpage :
262
Abstract :
In this paper we examine the benefits of random early detection (RED) by using a testbed made of two commercially available routers and up to 16 PCs to observe RED performance under a traffic load made of FTP transfers, together with HTTP traffic and non-responsive UDP flows. The main results we found were, first, that RED with small buffers does not improve significantly the performance of the network, in particular the overall throughput is smaller than with tail drop and the difference in delay is not significant. Second, parameter tuning in RED remains an inexact science, but has no big impact on the end-to-end performance. We argue that RED deployment is not straightforward, and we strongly recommend more research with realistic network settings to develop a full quantitative understanding of RED. Nevertheless, RED allows us to control the queue size with large buffers
Keywords :
buffer storage; delays; queueing theory; telecommunication equipment testing; telecommunication network routing; telecommunication traffic; transport protocols; FTP transfers; HTTP traffic; PC; RED; buffers; delay; network performance; non-responsive UDP flows; parameter tuning; queue size control; random early detection; routers; testbed; traffic load; Communication system traffic control; Feedback; Internet; Personal communication networks; Size control; Tail; Telecommunication traffic; Testing; Throughput; Traffic control;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Quality of Service, 1999. IWQoS '99. 1999 Seventh International Workshop on
Conference_Location :
London
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-5671-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IWQOS.1999.766502
Filename :
766502
Link To Document :
بازگشت