• DocumentCode
    2843233
  • Title

    A comparison of shielded versus non-shielded trailing cables for reeled applications

  • Author

    Fuller, Mark A.

  • Author_Institution
    Cablec Continental Cables Co., Marion, IN, USA
  • fYear
    1991
  • fDate
    Sept. 28 1991-Oct. 4 1991
  • Firstpage
    1236
  • Abstract
    Differences in cable life, the modes of failure, the ease of repair, and other pertinent comparisons are discussed for shielded versus nonshielded cables for underground mines. It is shown that type G-GC cables are longer-lasting than type SHD cables under severe reeling stresses, due primarily to the low compression resistance but also the low shear resistance of the cotton/copper braid shield. Breakage of individual wires leaves the sharp ends free to penetrate the insulation and initiate cable failure. While there is a good margin of safety built into recommendations, proper tension and the associated sidewall loading ultimately determine cable life for shielded versus unshielded cables for underground mines.<>
  • Keywords
    mining; power cables; shielding; underground cables; G-GC cables; SHD cables; cable life; compression resistance; failure; nonshielded trailing cables; reeled applications; reeling stresses; repair; safety; shielded trailing cables; sidewall loading; tension; underground mines; Annealing; Cable insulation; Cable shielding; Compressive stress; Conducting materials; Copper; Manufacturing; Mechanical cables; Rubber; Voltage;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 1991., Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Dearborn, MI, USA
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-0453-5
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IAS.1991.178020
  • Filename
    178020