DocumentCode
2843233
Title
A comparison of shielded versus non-shielded trailing cables for reeled applications
Author
Fuller, Mark A.
Author_Institution
Cablec Continental Cables Co., Marion, IN, USA
fYear
1991
fDate
Sept. 28 1991-Oct. 4 1991
Firstpage
1236
Abstract
Differences in cable life, the modes of failure, the ease of repair, and other pertinent comparisons are discussed for shielded versus nonshielded cables for underground mines. It is shown that type G-GC cables are longer-lasting than type SHD cables under severe reeling stresses, due primarily to the low compression resistance but also the low shear resistance of the cotton/copper braid shield. Breakage of individual wires leaves the sharp ends free to penetrate the insulation and initiate cable failure. While there is a good margin of safety built into recommendations, proper tension and the associated sidewall loading ultimately determine cable life for shielded versus unshielded cables for underground mines.<>
Keywords
mining; power cables; shielding; underground cables; G-GC cables; SHD cables; cable life; compression resistance; failure; nonshielded trailing cables; reeled applications; reeling stresses; repair; safety; shielded trailing cables; sidewall loading; tension; underground mines; Annealing; Cable insulation; Cable shielding; Compressive stress; Conducting materials; Copper; Manufacturing; Mechanical cables; Rubber; Voltage;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 1991., Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE
Conference_Location
Dearborn, MI, USA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0453-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IAS.1991.178020
Filename
178020
Link To Document