• DocumentCode
    2881079
  • Title

    Differences between algorithms for spatial interpolation of 3D echocardiography images

  • Author

    Sims, A.J. ; Wild, J. ; Pemberton, J. ; Irvine, T. ; Kenny, A. ; Murray, A.

  • Author_Institution
    Regional Med. Phys. Dept., Freeman Hosp., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    21-24 Sept. 2003
  • Firstpage
    185
  • Lastpage
    188
  • Abstract
    In 3D, ultrasound systems sample a conical volume of space with a given angular resolution, resulting in sparsely sampled regions far from the transducer. Image analysis operators require that each voxel of a cartesian volume has a value, and some form of interpolation is necessary. 3D images of the left ventricle (LV) of 10 patients were constructed from sequences of conventional B-mode frames which were successively rotated about the beam axis. Three different methods of interpolation were used to assign values to unsampled voxels. Reconstructed LV short axis views were extracted from the 3D images and analysed using standard edge detection and threshold operators. Results from the image analysis were used to compare the three different methods of interpolation. Results of this preliminary study show that the choice of interpolation method influences the results of image analysis operations.
  • Keywords
    echocardiography; edge detection; image reconstruction; image sequences; interpolation; medical image processing; 3D echocardiography images; conventional B-mode frames; edge detection; image analysis operators; image sequences; left ventricle; reconstructed LV short axis views; spatial interpolation; threshold operators; ultrasound systems; Biomedical imaging; Cardiology; Echocardiography; Hospitals; Image edge detection; Image reconstruction; Image sequence analysis; Interpolation; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonic transducer arrays;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Computers in Cardiology, 2003
  • ISSN
    0276-6547
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8170-X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CIC.2003.1291121
  • Filename
    1291121