DocumentCode :
2881079
Title :
Differences between algorithms for spatial interpolation of 3D echocardiography images
Author :
Sims, A.J. ; Wild, J. ; Pemberton, J. ; Irvine, T. ; Kenny, A. ; Murray, A.
Author_Institution :
Regional Med. Phys. Dept., Freeman Hosp., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
fYear :
2003
fDate :
21-24 Sept. 2003
Firstpage :
185
Lastpage :
188
Abstract :
In 3D, ultrasound systems sample a conical volume of space with a given angular resolution, resulting in sparsely sampled regions far from the transducer. Image analysis operators require that each voxel of a cartesian volume has a value, and some form of interpolation is necessary. 3D images of the left ventricle (LV) of 10 patients were constructed from sequences of conventional B-mode frames which were successively rotated about the beam axis. Three different methods of interpolation were used to assign values to unsampled voxels. Reconstructed LV short axis views were extracted from the 3D images and analysed using standard edge detection and threshold operators. Results from the image analysis were used to compare the three different methods of interpolation. Results of this preliminary study show that the choice of interpolation method influences the results of image analysis operations.
Keywords :
echocardiography; edge detection; image reconstruction; image sequences; interpolation; medical image processing; 3D echocardiography images; conventional B-mode frames; edge detection; image analysis operators; image sequences; left ventricle; reconstructed LV short axis views; spatial interpolation; threshold operators; ultrasound systems; Biomedical imaging; Cardiology; Echocardiography; Hospitals; Image edge detection; Image reconstruction; Image sequence analysis; Interpolation; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonic transducer arrays;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Computers in Cardiology, 2003
ISSN :
0276-6547
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-8170-X
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/CIC.2003.1291121
Filename :
1291121
Link To Document :
بازگشت