DocumentCode
288686
Title
When are tasks “difficult” for learning controllers?
Author
Geva, Shlomo ; Sitte, Joaquin ; Sira-Ramìrez, Hebertt
Author_Institution
Fac. of Inf. Technol., Queensland Univ. of Technol., Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Volume
4
fYear
1994
fDate
27 Jun-2 Jul 1994
Firstpage
2419
Abstract
Some control task, formerly believed to be difficult and used to demonstrate neural network unsupervised learning, can be accomplished with very simple controllers. There seems to be no learning method that discovers these controllers. This failure could be attributed to the learning algorithm or to starting with overly complex controller structures. We suggest using the probability that randomly selected controller is successful as measure of learning difficulty. To limit the size of the space of possible controllers we use Fliess´ classification of control problems into flat and non-flat. We illustrate the procedure on easy and difficult variants of the pendulum control task
Keywords
intelligent control; neural nets; neurocontrollers; nonlinear control systems; probability; unsupervised learning; Fliess´ classification; learning controllers; learning difficulty; neural network; nonlinear control; pendulum control task; probability; unsupervised learning; Adaptive control; Control systems; Information technology; Learning systems; Linear feedback control systems; Neural networks; Piecewise linear techniques; Size control; State feedback; Supervised learning;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Neural Networks, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., 1994 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Orlando, FL
Print_ISBN
0-7803-1901-X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICNN.1994.374599
Filename
374599
Link To Document