• DocumentCode
    288686
  • Title

    When are tasks “difficult” for learning controllers?

  • Author

    Geva, Shlomo ; Sitte, Joaquin ; Sira-Ramìrez, Hebertt

  • Author_Institution
    Fac. of Inf. Technol., Queensland Univ. of Technol., Brisbane, Qld., Australia
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    1994
  • fDate
    27 Jun-2 Jul 1994
  • Firstpage
    2419
  • Abstract
    Some control task, formerly believed to be difficult and used to demonstrate neural network unsupervised learning, can be accomplished with very simple controllers. There seems to be no learning method that discovers these controllers. This failure could be attributed to the learning algorithm or to starting with overly complex controller structures. We suggest using the probability that randomly selected controller is successful as measure of learning difficulty. To limit the size of the space of possible controllers we use Fliess´ classification of control problems into flat and non-flat. We illustrate the procedure on easy and difficult variants of the pendulum control task
  • Keywords
    intelligent control; neural nets; neurocontrollers; nonlinear control systems; probability; unsupervised learning; Fliess´ classification; learning controllers; learning difficulty; neural network; nonlinear control; pendulum control task; probability; unsupervised learning; Adaptive control; Control systems; Information technology; Learning systems; Linear feedback control systems; Neural networks; Piecewise linear techniques; Size control; State feedback; Supervised learning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Neural Networks, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., 1994 IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Orlando, FL
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-1901-X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICNN.1994.374599
  • Filename
    374599