DocumentCode
2897337
Title
Smart battery analog front end architecture comparison-integrated voltage-to-frequency vs. analog-to-digital converters
Author
Hamlett, Mark ; Bonnett, W. Bruce
Author_Institution
Adv. Analog Products, Texas Instrum. Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
fYear
2001
fDate
2001
Firstpage
293
Lastpage
298
Abstract
The majority of state-of-charge based battery “fuel gauging” analog front end solutions are performed by either an analog-to-digital converter or a continuously integrated voltage-to-frequency converter. Comparable cost solutions are compared from the point of view of performance and difficulty of implementation. Laboratory results from both architectures are shown for common battery charge/discharge profiles
Keywords
analogue-digital conversion; secondary cells; voltage measurement; voltage-frequency convertors; analog-to-digital converter; battery charge/discharge profiles; cost solutions; performance; smart battery analog front end architecture; state-of-charge; voltage-to-frequency converter; Analog-digital conversion; Battery charge measurement; Charge measurement; Costs; Current measurement; Gain measurement; Instruments; Q measurement; Resistors; Voltage measurement;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Applications and Advances, 2001. The Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on
Conference_Location
Long Beach, CA
ISSN
1089-8182
Print_ISBN
0-7803-6545-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/BCAA.2001.905142
Filename
905142
Link To Document