• DocumentCode
    2907472
  • Title

    Is independence good for combining classifiers?

  • Author

    Kuncheva, L.I. ; Whitaker, C.J. ; Shipp, C.A. ; Duin, R.P.W.

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Inf., Univ. of Wales, Bangor, UK
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2000
  • fDate
    2000
  • Firstpage
    168
  • Abstract
    Independence between individual classifiers is typically viewed as an asset in classifier fusion. We study the limits on the majority vote accuracy when combining dependent classifiers. Q statistics are used to measure the dependence between classifiers. We show that dependent classifiers could offer a dramatic improvement over the individual accuracy. However, the relationship between dependency and accuracy of the pool is ambivalent. A synthetic experiment demonstrates the intuitive result that, in general, negative dependence is preferable
  • Keywords
    pattern classification; statistics; Q statistics; classifier fusion; dependent classifiers; independence; majority vote accuracy; negative dependence; Accuracy; Electronic mail; Error correction; Informatics; Probability; Q measurement; Statistics; Table lookup; Voting; Zinc;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. 15th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Barcelona
  • ISSN
    1051-4651
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7695-0750-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICPR.2000.906041
  • Filename
    906041