DocumentCode :
2907472
Title :
Is independence good for combining classifiers?
Author :
Kuncheva, L.I. ; Whitaker, C.J. ; Shipp, C.A. ; Duin, R.P.W.
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Inf., Univ. of Wales, Bangor, UK
Volume :
2
fYear :
2000
fDate :
2000
Firstpage :
168
Abstract :
Independence between individual classifiers is typically viewed as an asset in classifier fusion. We study the limits on the majority vote accuracy when combining dependent classifiers. Q statistics are used to measure the dependence between classifiers. We show that dependent classifiers could offer a dramatic improvement over the individual accuracy. However, the relationship between dependency and accuracy of the pool is ambivalent. A synthetic experiment demonstrates the intuitive result that, in general, negative dependence is preferable
Keywords :
pattern classification; statistics; Q statistics; classifier fusion; dependent classifiers; independence; majority vote accuracy; negative dependence; Accuracy; Electronic mail; Error correction; Informatics; Probability; Q measurement; Statistics; Table lookup; Voting; Zinc;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. 15th International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Barcelona
ISSN :
1051-4651
Print_ISBN :
0-7695-0750-6
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICPR.2000.906041
Filename :
906041
Link To Document :
بازگشت