DocumentCode
2907472
Title
Is independence good for combining classifiers?
Author
Kuncheva, L.I. ; Whitaker, C.J. ; Shipp, C.A. ; Duin, R.P.W.
Author_Institution
Sch. of Inf., Univ. of Wales, Bangor, UK
Volume
2
fYear
2000
fDate
2000
Firstpage
168
Abstract
Independence between individual classifiers is typically viewed as an asset in classifier fusion. We study the limits on the majority vote accuracy when combining dependent classifiers. Q statistics are used to measure the dependence between classifiers. We show that dependent classifiers could offer a dramatic improvement over the individual accuracy. However, the relationship between dependency and accuracy of the pool is ambivalent. A synthetic experiment demonstrates the intuitive result that, in general, negative dependence is preferable
Keywords
pattern classification; statistics; Q statistics; classifier fusion; dependent classifiers; independence; majority vote accuracy; negative dependence; Accuracy; Electronic mail; Error correction; Informatics; Probability; Q measurement; Statistics; Table lookup; Voting; Zinc;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. 15th International Conference on
Conference_Location
Barcelona
ISSN
1051-4651
Print_ISBN
0-7695-0750-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICPR.2000.906041
Filename
906041
Link To Document