DocumentCode
2920105
Title
Are departments obsolete? [education]
Author
Olds, Barbara M. ; Miller, Ronald L.
Author_Institution
Colorado Sch. of Mines, Golden, CO, USA
fYear
1991
fDate
21-24 Sep 1991
Firstpage
213
Lastpage
217
Abstract
The authors note that so much of the work they are presently engaged in at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) is interdisciplinary that they are asking themselves whether the `major´ as it has evolved over the past few decades is really the best way to package undergraduate engineering education. Based on recent experiences, they have begun to conclude that specialization may be better pursued at the graduate rather than the undergraduate level and that undergraduate engineering students may do just as well, if not better, with a broad-based general degree than with a specialized one. If this is true, the typical engineering departmental structure may be obsolete. It is pointed out that a number of institutions, engineering schools, and individual departments are already recognizing the kinds of problems with which the authors are concerned and are developing innovative solutions. The authors discuss various models at the institutional, departmental, and programmatic levels which support their contention that the existing departmental structure is obsolete
Keywords
education; engineering; CSM; Colorado School of Mines; departmental levels; institutional levels; programmatic levels; students; undergraduate engineering education; Arm; Art; Design engineering; Engineering education; Engineering profession; Hardware; Information security; Jamming; Knowledge engineering; Stress;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Frontiers in Education Conference, 1991. Twenty-First Annual Conference. 'Engineering Education in a New World Order.' Proceedings.
Conference_Location
West Lafayette, IN
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0222-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/FIE.1991.187473
Filename
187473
Link To Document