• DocumentCode
    2940385
  • Title

    Is the cyclic prefix necessary?

  • Author

    Sharma, Naresh ; Tikku, Ashok A.

  • Author_Institution
    Indian Inst. of Technol., Delhi
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    9-14 July 2006
  • Firstpage
    128
  • Lastpage
    132
  • Abstract
    We show that one can do away with the cyclic prefix (CP) for SC-FDE and OFDM at the cost of a moderate increase in complexity of a DFT-based receiver. Such an approach effectively deals with the decrease in the number of channel uses due to the introduction of the CP. It is shown that the SINR for SC-FDE remains the same asymptotically with the proposed receiver without CP as that of the conventional receiver with CP
  • Keywords
    OFDM modulation; discrete Fourier transforms; equalisers; DFT-based receiver; OFDM; SC-FDE; cyclic prefix; Convolution; Costs; Data communication; Discrete Fourier transforms; Equalizers; Filters; Frequency division multiplexing; Intersymbol interference; OFDM; Signal to noise ratio;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Information Theory, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Seattle, WA
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0505-X
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1-4244-0504-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISIT.2006.261688
  • Filename
    4035935
    • Link To Document
    https://search.isc.ac/dl/search/defaultta.aspx?DTC=49&DC=2940385