• DocumentCode
    294060
  • Title

    Quantitative validation of a new coregistration algorithm

  • Author

    Pickar, R.D. ; Esser, P.D. ; Pozniakoff, T.A. ; van Heertum, R.L. ; Stoddart, H.A., Jr.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Radiol., Columbia Univ., New York, NY, USA
  • Volume
    3
  • fYear
    1994
  • fDate
    30 Oct-5 Nov 1994
  • Firstpage
    1403
  • Abstract
    The Neuro900 Image Coregistration Software (Strichman Medical Equipment) for SPECT was evaluated for translational and rotational registration accuracy. A Tc-99m HM-PAO split-dose study (0.53 mCi low dose, L, and 1.01 mCi high dose, H) was simulated with a Hoffman Brain Phantom with five fiducial markers. Translation error was determined by a shift in image centroid, and rotation error was determined by a simplified two-axis approach. Changes in registration accuracy were measured with respect to: 1) slice spacing, using the four different combinations LL, LH, HL, HH, 2) translational misalignment before coregistration, 3) changes in the step size of the iterative parameters. In all the cases the algorithm converged with only small difference in translation offset, θ and φ. At 6 mm slice spacing, translational errors ranged from 0.9 to 2.8 mm (system resolution at 100 mm, 6.8 mm). The converged parameters showed little sensitivity to count density. In addition the correlation coefficient increased with decreasing iterative step size, as expected. Based on the authors´ results, they found that this algorithm based on the maximization of the correlation coefficient between studies was an effective and efficient way to coregister SPECT data
  • Keywords
    brain; image registration; medical image processing; single photon emission computed tomography; 1.01E-3 ci; 5.3E-4 ci; Hoffman brain phantom; Neuro900 image coregistration software; SPECT; Tc; Tc-99m HM-PAO split-dose study; coregistration algorithm; diagnostic nuclear medicine; fiducial markers; image centroid shift; iterative parameters step size; medical diagnostic imaging; quantitative validation; rotation error; rotational registration accuracy; slice spacing; translation error; translational misalignment; translational registration accuracy; Biomedical equipment; Brain modeling; Image reconstruction; Imaging phantoms; Iterative algorithms; Medical simulation; Nuclear medicine; Radiology; Surface reconstruction; User interfaces;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 1994., 1994 IEEE Conference Record
  • Conference_Location
    Norfolk, VA
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-2544-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NSSMIC.1994.474621
  • Filename
    474621