DocumentCode :
2958984
Title :
A Comparison Study on the Evaluation Criteria for Corporate Social Responsibility
Author :
Tsai, Sang Bing ; Lee, Yu Cheng ; Wu, Chia Huei ; Lo, Kai Li
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Technol. Manage., Chung Hua Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan
fYear :
2011
fDate :
12-14 Aug. 2011
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
5
Abstract :
All over the world the topic of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is becoming more and more important. Currently, there are nine different sets of CSR evaluation criteria being used worldwide. As each of the different evaluation methods vary from one another, it is difficult to compare the results from two different tests in order to evaluate the CSR scores of one company against another. This research selects four sets of CSR criteria, three which have international credibility, the SA8000, the GRI, and the ISO26000, as well as the Corporate Social Responsibility Best Practice Principles for TWSE/GTSM-Listed Companies (known as the TW Principles) released in 2010. In our research, we will review the current literature on the evaluation criteria to compare and contrast the different CSR evaluation criteria, present our results and make conclusions.
Keywords :
corporate social responsibility; standards; GRI; ISO26000; SA8000; TW principles; TWSE/GTSM; corporate social responsibility; evaluation criteria; international credibility; Companies; Economics; Law; Standards organizations;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Management and Service Science (MASS), 2011 International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Wuhan
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-6579-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICMSS.2011.5997938
Filename :
5997938
Link To Document :
بازگشت