• DocumentCode
    2970211
  • Title

    Comparison of isothermal, constant current and SWEAT wafer level EM testing methods

  • Author

    Lee, Tom C. ; Tibel, Deborah ; Sullivan, Timothy D.

  • Author_Institution
    Div. of Microelectron., IBM Corp., Essex Junction, VT, USA
  • fYear
    2000
  • fDate
    2000
  • Firstpage
    61
  • Lastpage
    69
  • Abstract
    In this paper, we present data from three wafer level electromigration test techniques, isothermal, constant current, and standard wafer level electromigration accelerated test (SWEAT), and compare various aspects of the data. The isothermal method keeps the test line at a constant temperature by monitoring line resistance during test. The constant current method simply applies a constant current of the same magnitude to all lines, without making any adjustments for individual geometric differences. The SWEAT method holds the time to failure constant by using Black´s equation to determine the applied current needed to bring about the chosen failure time. Six different line widths ranging from 0.150 to 4.285 μm of AlCu metallization were stressed by all three methods, at temperatures from 300 to 380°C in 10°C steps
  • Keywords
    aluminium alloys; copper alloys; electromigration; failure analysis; life testing; metallisation; 0.150 to 4.285 micron; 300 to 380 C; AlCu; AlCu metallization; Black equation; SWEAT method; constant current method; failure time; isothermal method; wafer-level electromigration testing; Condition monitoring; Electromigration; Equations; Isothermal processes; Life estimation; Metallization; Temperature distribution; Temperature measurement; Temperature sensors; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report, 2000 IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Lake Tahoe, CA
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-6392-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IRWS.2000.911902
  • Filename
    911902