DocumentCode :
2979045
Title :
On the difference between two widely publicized methods for analyzing oscillator phase behavior
Author :
Vanassche, Piet ; Gielen, Georges ; Sansen, Willy
Author_Institution :
ESAT/MICAS, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
fYear :
2002
fDate :
10-14 Nov. 2002
Firstpage :
229
Lastpage :
233
Abstract :
This paper describes the similarities and differences between two widely publicized methods for analyzing oscillator phase behavior. The methods were presented by Adler (1946) and Hajimiri and Lee (1998). It is pointed out that both methods are almost alike. While Alder´s one in can be shown to be, mathematically, more exact, the approximate method of Hajimiri and Lee is somewhat simpler, facilitating its use for purposes of analysis and design. In this paper, we show that, for stationary input noise sources, both methods produce equal results for the oscillator´s phase noise behavior. However, when considering injection locking, it is shown that both methods yield different results, with the approximation of Hajimiri and Lee being unable to predict the locking behavior. In general, when the input signal causing the oscillator phase perturbations is non-stationary, the exact model produces the correct results while results obtained using the approximate model break down.
Keywords :
circuit noise; injection locked oscillators; network analysis; phase noise; radiofrequency oscillators; analysis methods; approximate method; injection locking; oscillator phase behavior analysis; phase noise behavior; Circuit noise; Frequency; Injection-locked oscillators; Integral equations; Mutual coupling; Phase noise; Predictive models;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Computer Aided Design, 2002. ICCAD 2002. IEEE/ACM International Conference on
ISSN :
1092-3152
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-7607-2
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICCAD.2002.1167539
Filename :
1167539
Link To Document :
بازگشت