DocumentCode
2999337
Title
Bulk CMOS Device Optimization for High-Speed and Ultra-Low Power Operations
Author
Bero, Brent ; Nyathi, Jabulani
Author_Institution
Sch. of EECS, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA
Volume
2
fYear
2006
fDate
6-9 Aug. 2006
Firstpage
221
Lastpage
225
Abstract
Interest in subthreshold design has increased due to the emergence of systems that require ultra-low power and the ever increasing leakage currents (now used to drive logic). Subthreshold sacrifices speed for power creating a clear divide between designing for high speed and ultra-low power. It might be beneficial to allow subthreshold circuits to operate in super-threshold, depending on processing needs. In this paper, the feasibility of optimizing device sizes for both subthreshold and above threshold operations is considered. In addition body biasing techniques that could facilitate bridging the speed gap are presented Device sizing for circuits of the subthreshold region is examined with the view that these circuits could be optimized for subthreshold but also operate effectively in super-threshold. In an effort to attain optimal performance (speed-power), an operating region is identified in terms of the energy-delay product. To enhance the operating speed of both subthreshold and super-threshold circuits, a novel body biasing technique termed tunable body biasing (TBB), is introduced This approach leads to increased operating frequencies particularly in subthreshold operation and shows no performance degradation at voltages above threshold, hence bridging of the speed gap. Post layout simulations of circuits ranging from simple to more complex ones enable for effective evaluation of optimal device sizing and identifying the optimal power-speed operational region. Simulations have been performed at a modest 180 nm technology node and circuits show optimal operating regions ranging from 0.5 to 1.1 V. Further more results indicate that the TBB approach for an inverter triples speed and has a 60 percent lower EDP while dissipating just 28 percent more energy than a traditionally biased approach (pMOS bulk at VDD and nMOS bulk at Vss).
Keywords
CMOS integrated circuits; circuit optimisation; circuit simulation; high-speed integrated circuits; integrated circuit design; low-power electronics; EDP; body biasing techniques; bulk CMOS device optimization; drive logic; energy-delay product terms; high-speed operations; inverter; leakage currents; operating speed enhancement; post circuit layout simulations; size 180 nm; subthreshold circuits; subthreshold design; super-threshold operation; tunable body biasing; ultra-low power operations; voltage 0.5 V to 1.1 V; CMOS logic circuits; Circuit simulation; Degradation; Frequency; Inverters; Leakage current; Logic design; Logic devices; Threshold voltage; Tunable circuits and devices;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Circuits and Systems, 2006. MWSCAS '06. 49th IEEE International Midwest Symposium on
Conference_Location
San Juan
ISSN
1548-3746
Print_ISBN
1-4244-0172-0
Electronic_ISBN
1548-3746
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/MWSCAS.2006.382250
Filename
4267328
Link To Document