Title :
Does feedback modality affect performance of brain computer interfaces?
Author :
Darvishi, Sam ; Ridding, Michael C. ; Abbott, Derek ; Baumert, Mathias
Author_Institution :
Centre for Biomed. Eng., Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Abstract :
Brain computer interfaces (BCI) are used for communication and rehabilitation. One of the main categories of BCI techniques is motor imagery based BCI (MI-BCI). A large number of studies have focused on machine learning approaches to optimize MI-BCI performance. However, enhancement of MI-BCI through provision of optimized feedback modalities has not received equal attention. Motor imagery and motor execution activate almost the same area of the brain. During motor skills performance, a combination of proprioceptive and direct visual feedback (PDVF) is provided. Thus, we hypothesized that MI-BCI that receives PDVF outperforms the traditional MI-BCI, which only uses indirect visual feedback (IVF). We studied 8 healthy subjects performing MI through (i) IVF and (ii) PDVF. We used 8 channel electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and extracted features using an autoregressive model and classified MIs using linear regression. On average, PDVF increased the accuracy of MI performance by 11%, and improved information transfer rate (ITR) by more than two times. In conclusion, using PDVF appears to improve MI-BCI performance according to the studied metrics, making this approach potentially more reliable.
Keywords :
autoregressive processes; brain; brain-computer interfaces; electroencephalography; feature extraction; learning (artificial intelligence); medical signal processing; neurophysiology; regression analysis; EEG signals; MI-BCI performance; autoregressive model; brain; brain computer interface performance; electroencephalogram signals; feature extraction; feedback modality; improved information transfer rate; indirect visual feedback; linear regression; machine learning; motor imagery based BCI; motor skill performance; optimized feedback modalities; proprioceptive direct visual feedback; Accuracy; Brain-computer interfaces; Electroencephalography; Feature extraction; Monitoring; Training; Visualization; EEG; accuracy; brain-computer interfaces; information transfer rate; motor imagery; motor learning;
Conference_Titel :
Neural Engineering (NER), 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on
Conference_Location :
Montpellier
DOI :
10.1109/NER.2015.7146602