DocumentCode
3003015
Title
Reliability predictions to support a design for reliability program
Author
Bechtold, Lori E.
Author_Institution
Boeing Res. & Technol., Seattle, WA, USA
fYear
2011
fDate
24-27 Jan. 2011
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
4
Abstract
Traditional reliability prediction methods have in the past missed the mark in supporting the system engineering design process to such a great extent that some professionals view any form of reliability prediction as anathema to designing reliable systems. For example, the Department of Defense (DoD) Guide for Achieving Reliability, Availability and Maintainability cites “Reliance on predictions instead of conducting engineering design analysis” as one of many reasons why military systems are failing to meet reliability targets. The December 6, 2007 memorandum on reliability from Assistant Secretary of the Army, Claude Bolton, states “Reliability Predictions, based on handbooks or similar approaches, are historically highly inaccurate and can lead to poor design decisions.” Efforts are underway to change this. Industry and the DoD are working together to revamp reliability prediction processes so that they provide the needed information to the design process in a timely fashion as well as provide relevant information for decisions in testing and sustainable field support.
Keywords
design engineering; failure analysis; product design; reliability; sustainable development; systems engineering; Department of Defense; design process; reliability prediction; reliability program; sustainable field support; system engineering design process; Fatigue; Industries; Mathematical model; Quality function deployment; Reliability engineering; Design-for-Reliability; Physics of Failure; Predictions;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2011 Proceedings - Annual
Conference_Location
Lake Buena Vista, FL
ISSN
0149-144X
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-8857-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/RAMS.2011.5754470
Filename
5754470
Link To Document