DocumentCode
3008353
Title
Evaluating Key Statements Analysis
Author
Binkley, David ; Gold, Nicolas ; Harman, Mark ; Li, Zheng ; Mahdavi, Kiarash
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., King´´s Coll. London, London
fYear
2008
fDate
28-29 Sept. 2008
Firstpage
121
Lastpage
130
Abstract
Key statement analysis extracts from a program, statements that form the core of the programpsilas computation. A good set of key statements is small but has a large impact. Key statements form a useful starting point for understanding and manipulating a program. An empirical investigation of three kinds of key statements is presented. The three are based on Bieman and Ottpsilas principal variables. To be effective, the key statements must have high impact and form a small, highly cohesive unit. Using a minor improvement of metrics for measuring impact and cohesion, key statements are shown to capture about 75% of the semantic effect of the function from which they are drawn. At the same time, they have cohesion about 20 percentage points higher than the corresponding function. A statistical analysis of the differences shows that key statements have higher average impact and higher average cohesion (p<0.001).
Keywords
program slicing; software metrics; key statements analysis evaluation; principal variable; program slicing; Computer science; Educational institutions; Gold; Humans; Reverse engineering; Software maintenance; Statistical analysis; Cohesion; Impact; Principal Variables; Program Slicing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Working Conference on
Conference_Location
Beijing
Print_ISBN
978-0-7695-3353-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/SCAM.2008.40
Filename
4637545
Link To Document