• DocumentCode
    3008353
  • Title

    Evaluating Key Statements Analysis

  • Author

    Binkley, David ; Gold, Nicolas ; Harman, Mark ; Li, Zheng ; Mahdavi, Kiarash

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., King´´s Coll. London, London
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    28-29 Sept. 2008
  • Firstpage
    121
  • Lastpage
    130
  • Abstract
    Key statement analysis extracts from a program, statements that form the core of the programpsilas computation. A good set of key statements is small but has a large impact. Key statements form a useful starting point for understanding and manipulating a program. An empirical investigation of three kinds of key statements is presented. The three are based on Bieman and Ottpsilas principal variables. To be effective, the key statements must have high impact and form a small, highly cohesive unit. Using a minor improvement of metrics for measuring impact and cohesion, key statements are shown to capture about 75% of the semantic effect of the function from which they are drawn. At the same time, they have cohesion about 20 percentage points higher than the corresponding function. A statistical analysis of the differences shows that key statements have higher average impact and higher average cohesion (p<0.001).
  • Keywords
    program slicing; software metrics; key statements analysis evaluation; principal variable; program slicing; Computer science; Educational institutions; Gold; Humans; Reverse engineering; Software maintenance; Statistical analysis; Cohesion; Impact; Principal Variables; Program Slicing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Working Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Beijing
  • Print_ISBN
    978-0-7695-3353-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/SCAM.2008.40
  • Filename
    4637545