DocumentCode :
300922
Title :
Physics requirements for ITER engineering systems
Author :
Sauthoff, N. ; Perkins, F. ; Wesley, J. ; Amano, T. ; Boucher, D. ; Cohen, S. ; Fujisawa, N. ; Janeschitz, G. ; Mukhovatov, V. ; Nevins, W. ; Ortolani, S. ; Post, D. ; Vinski, S. Put ; Rosenbluth, M. ; Uckan, N. ; Young, K.
Author_Institution :
Princeton Plasma Phys. Lab., Princeton, NJ, USA
Volume :
1
fYear :
1995
fDate :
30 Sep-5 Oct 1995
Firstpage :
130
Abstract :
Specific performance from imposes loads on other supporting subsystems and subsystems. This paper overviews system requirements dictated by the plasma´s needs and impacts. Overall device parameters have been derived from the performance goals using plasma transport and stability models based on physics R and D results. Most transport issues relate to the extrapolation of the plasma behavior to ITER´s large size (especially relative to the gyroradius). Plasma control systems must achieve shape and position flexibility sufficient for the performance of the power handling and auxiliary power systems. Induced currents in the conducting structures between the poloidal coils and the plasma both provide passive stabilization of plasma disturbances and delay plasma responses to external magnetic controls. Auxiliary power systems must heat the plasma to ignition and drive noninductive currents for steady state operation, and may have to drive plasma rotation if physics confirms the need for rotation indicated by recent theories of resistive wall stabilization. Diagnostics must support plasma control and performance assessment and contribute to physics understanding. The first wall must handle steady state power and energetic neutral bombardment, and will experience transient power and runaway electron loads. The divertor system must disperse the incoming power while confining the divertor´s higher concentration neutral gas and pumping the helium. In-vessel structural design is driven by the forces related to plasma disruptions, which induce currents in the conducting structures and drive non-axisymmetric “halo currents” between the plasma and the conductors. Such plasma control needs and impacts from power and disruption handling are described
Keywords :
fusion reactor ignition; fusion reactor theory; fusion reactors; plasma diagnostics; plasma flow; plasma instability; ITER; auxiliary power systems; conducting structures; diagnostics; divertor; engineering systems; first wall; halo currents; induced currents; noninductive currents; plasma control; plasma disruption; plasma rotation; plasma stability; plasma transport; power handling; runaway electron; Physics; Plasma confinement; Plasma devices; Plasma diagnostics; Plasma stability; Plasma transport processes; Power system modeling; Power system stability; Shape control; Systems engineering and theory;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Fusion Engineering, 1995. SOFE '95. Seeking a New Energy Era., 16th IEEE/NPSS Symposium
Conference_Location :
Champaign, IL
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-2969-4
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/FUSION.1995.534189
Filename :
534189
Link To Document :
بازگشت