DocumentCode :
3031547
Title :
A comparison of three algorithms for blind equalization based on the constant modulus error criterion
Author :
Schirtzinger, T. ; Li, X. ; Jenkins, W.K.
Author_Institution :
Coordinated Sci. Lab., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA
Volume :
2
fYear :
1995
fDate :
9-12 May 1995
Firstpage :
1049
Abstract :
Three constant modulus algorithms (CMA), the fast quasi-Newton CMA, the transform domain CMA, and the genetic search based CMA are proposed in this paper. The performances of these three algorithms are compared with each other via computer simulation. It is shown that the fast quasi-Newton CMA and the transform domain CMA achieve much faster convergence rate than the constant modulus algorithm based on the LMS algorithm. This fact shows that the whitening technique is not only useful but also necessary for the CMA
Keywords :
adaptive equalisers; error analysis; genetic algorithms; transforms; LMS algorithm; algorithms; blind equalization; computer simulation; constant modulus error criterion; convergence rate; fast quasi-Newton CMA; genetic search based CMA; performances; transform domain CMA; whitening technique; Adaptive equalizers; Blind equalizers; Computer errors; Computer simulation; Convergence; Cost function; Filters; Frequency domain analysis; Genetics; Least squares approximation;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1995. ICASSP-95., 1995 International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Detroit, MI
ISSN :
1520-6149
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-2431-5
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480414
Filename :
480414
Link To Document :
بازگشت