• DocumentCode
    303994
  • Title

    Comparing controllers with the ball in a tube experiment

  • Author

    Pereira, John S. ; Bowles, John B.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., South Carolina Univ., Columbia, SC, USA
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    8-11 Sep 1996
  • Firstpage
    504
  • Abstract
    The control objective for the “ball in a tube” is to regulate the speed of a fan blowing air into a tube so as to keep a small ball suspended at some predetermined level in the tube. This is a difficult control problem due to the nonlinear effects on the ball and the complex physics governing its behavior. There is also a significant time delay in the system response. Here we use this device to experimentally compare a conventional PID controller and several types of fuzzy controllers under changing conditions: restricted airflow change of setpoint, and change of ball. The results show significant differences in the performance characteristics of the controllers. Overall the Fuzzy PID and Fuzzy PI controllers performed the best. The conventional PID controller too was stable but displayed a much slower response time. The Fuzzy P and Fuzzy PD controllers showed relatively poor performance
  • Keywords
    delays; fuzzy control; nonlinear systems; position control; three-term control; two-term control; Fuzzy PI control; Fuzzy PID control; PID control; air suspended ball; fan blowing air; fuzzy control; nonlinear systems; position control; time delay; Control systems; Delay effects; Fuzzy control; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy sets; Physics; Pi control; Proportional control; Three-term control; Voltage;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Fuzzy Systems, 1996., Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    New Orleans, LA
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3645-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FUZZY.1996.551792
  • Filename
    551792