DocumentCode
3063888
Title
Fractal dimension, only a fraction of the truth?
Author
Albregtsen, Fritz ; Nielsen, Birgitte ; Yogesan, Kanagasingam
Author_Institution
Dept. of Inf., Oslo Univ., Norway
fYear
1992
fDate
30 Aug-3 Sep 1992
Firstpage
733
Lastpage
736
Abstract
A sequence of synthetic images is used in order to compare three different fractal dimension estimation methods. The best methods are then applied to TEM images of mouse liver cell nuclei, to see if the methods are able to distinguish between normal cells and cells with induced cancer. The authors find that an ∈-blanket method gives the best estimate of the fractal dimension, and also the best separation between the two types of cells. However, fractal dimension and a simplified lacunarity feature are not sufficient for a reliable discrimination between the two classes of cells. Finally, the authors demonstrate that one can easily derive a fractal dimension related texture feature from the difference in the number of gray level runs at two different gray value quantization widths
Keywords
biological techniques and instruments; cellular biophysics; fractals; image segmentation; image sequences; image texture; liver; transmission electron microscopy; TEM images; cellular biophysics; discrimination; fractal dimension estimation methods; gray value quantization widths; image segmentation; image texture; in -blanket method; induced cancer; mouse liver cell nuclei; normal; simplified lacunarity feature; synthetic images; texture feature; Biological system modeling; Cancer; Fractals; Image segmentation; Informatics; Liver; Mice; Probability distribution; Quantization; Tellurium;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Pattern Recognition, 1992. Vol.III. Conference C: Image, Speech and Signal Analysis, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on
Conference_Location
The Hague
Print_ISBN
0-8186-2920-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICPR.1992.202091
Filename
202091
Link To Document