• DocumentCode
    3063888
  • Title

    Fractal dimension, only a fraction of the truth?

  • Author

    Albregtsen, Fritz ; Nielsen, Birgitte ; Yogesan, Kanagasingam

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf., Oslo Univ., Norway
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    30 Aug-3 Sep 1992
  • Firstpage
    733
  • Lastpage
    736
  • Abstract
    A sequence of synthetic images is used in order to compare three different fractal dimension estimation methods. The best methods are then applied to TEM images of mouse liver cell nuclei, to see if the methods are able to distinguish between normal cells and cells with induced cancer. The authors find that an ∈-blanket method gives the best estimate of the fractal dimension, and also the best separation between the two types of cells. However, fractal dimension and a simplified lacunarity feature are not sufficient for a reliable discrimination between the two classes of cells. Finally, the authors demonstrate that one can easily derive a fractal dimension related texture feature from the difference in the number of gray level runs at two different gray value quantization widths
  • Keywords
    biological techniques and instruments; cellular biophysics; fractals; image segmentation; image sequences; image texture; liver; transmission electron microscopy; TEM images; cellular biophysics; discrimination; fractal dimension estimation methods; gray value quantization widths; image segmentation; image texture; in -blanket method; induced cancer; mouse liver cell nuclei; normal; simplified lacunarity feature; synthetic images; texture feature; Biological system modeling; Cancer; Fractals; Image segmentation; Informatics; Liver; Mice; Probability distribution; Quantization; Tellurium;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Pattern Recognition, 1992. Vol.III. Conference C: Image, Speech and Signal Analysis, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    The Hague
  • Print_ISBN
    0-8186-2920-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICPR.1992.202091
  • Filename
    202091