• DocumentCode
    3066105
  • Title

    Adjacent or polar drive?: Image reconstruction implications in Electrical Impedance Tomography systems employing filtered back projection

  • Author

    Avis, N J ; Barber, D.C.

  • Author_Institution
    School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex and Department of Medical Physics & Medical Engineering. University of Sheffield., UK
  • Volume
    5
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    Oct. 29 1992-Nov. 1 1992
  • Firstpage
    1689
  • Lastpage
    1690
  • Abstract
    The results of an investigation to determine the image reconstruction implications of using adjacent or polar drive configurations in Electrical Impedance Tomography systems employing the filtered back projection image reconstruction algorithm are presented. The filtered back projection image reconstruction process is expressed in terms of forward and back projection matrices. The back projection matrix is found by means of the Bipolar Transformation and the forward projection matrix by the Finite Element Method. The rank and ill-conditioning of these matrices were investigated by the Singular Value Decomposition technique. The results show that compared to images reconstructed via the adjacent drive matrices the polar drive images suffer a large loss in resolution and the polar drive configuration should therefore be avoided.
  • Keywords
    Biomedical imaging; Educational institutions; Image reconstruction;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Paris, France
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-0785-2
  • Electronic_ISBN
    0-7803-0816-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.1992.5761991
  • Filename
    5761991