DocumentCode
3066105
Title
Adjacent or polar drive?: Image reconstruction implications in Electrical Impedance Tomography systems employing filtered back projection
Author
Avis, N J ; Barber, D.C.
Author_Institution
School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex and Department of Medical Physics & Medical Engineering. University of Sheffield., UK
Volume
5
fYear
1992
fDate
Oct. 29 1992-Nov. 1 1992
Firstpage
1689
Lastpage
1690
Abstract
The results of an investigation to determine the image reconstruction implications of using adjacent or polar drive configurations in Electrical Impedance Tomography systems employing the filtered back projection image reconstruction algorithm are presented. The filtered back projection image reconstruction process is expressed in terms of forward and back projection matrices. The back projection matrix is found by means of the Bipolar Transformation and the forward projection matrix by the Finite Element Method. The rank and ill-conditioning of these matrices were investigated by the Singular Value Decomposition technique. The results show that compared to images reconstructed via the adjacent drive matrices the polar drive images suffer a large loss in resolution and the polar drive configuration should therefore be avoided.
Keywords
Biomedical imaging; Educational institutions; Image reconstruction;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location
Paris, France
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0785-2
Electronic_ISBN
0-7803-0816-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IEMBS.1992.5761991
Filename
5761991
Link To Document