DocumentCode
3082749
Title
A critique of privacy
Author
Arnold, Michael ; Adamson, Greg
Author_Institution
Sch. of Philos., Anthropology & Social Inquiry, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
fYear
2010
fDate
7-9 June 2010
Firstpage
427
Lastpage
434
Abstract
In this polemical paper we present a Socratian dialogue that both critiques privacy and addresses its value. The purpose of this dialogue is to address questions that are often begged in the contemporary discourse around privacy, surveillance and technology - a discourse that assumes that privacy is a personal and social good without necessarily arguing the case. To prosecute the debate we have Aspicio - who will argue that privacy is a condition that is not only limited as a personal and social good, but is undesirable in many important respects. Aspicio is confronted by Occulto, who will argue that privacy is a condition that can and should be obtained and defended. In the course of the dialogue our interlocutors discuss privacy as a right; privacy and modernity; privacy, the public sphere and the private sphere; privacy and individualism; the value of surveillance; and privacy, embarrassment and shame.
Keywords
data privacy; Aspicio; Occulto; Socratian dialogue; contemporary discourse; privacy condition; private sphere; public sphere; social good; surveillance; Australia; Cultural differences; Humans; Information systems; Law; Paper technology; Privacy; Social implications of technology; Societies; Surveillance;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Technology and Society (ISTAS), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on
Conference_Location
Wollongong, NSW
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-7777-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514612
Filename
5514612
Link To Document