• DocumentCode
    3082749
  • Title

    A critique of privacy

  • Author

    Arnold, Michael ; Adamson, Greg

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Philos., Anthropology & Social Inquiry, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    7-9 June 2010
  • Firstpage
    427
  • Lastpage
    434
  • Abstract
    In this polemical paper we present a Socratian dialogue that both critiques privacy and addresses its value. The purpose of this dialogue is to address questions that are often begged in the contemporary discourse around privacy, surveillance and technology - a discourse that assumes that privacy is a personal and social good without necessarily arguing the case. To prosecute the debate we have Aspicio - who will argue that privacy is a condition that is not only limited as a personal and social good, but is undesirable in many important respects. Aspicio is confronted by Occulto, who will argue that privacy is a condition that can and should be obtained and defended. In the course of the dialogue our interlocutors discuss privacy as a right; privacy and modernity; privacy, the public sphere and the private sphere; privacy and individualism; the value of surveillance; and privacy, embarrassment and shame.
  • Keywords
    data privacy; Aspicio; Occulto; Socratian dialogue; contemporary discourse; privacy condition; private sphere; public sphere; social good; surveillance; Australia; Cultural differences; Humans; Information systems; Law; Paper technology; Privacy; Social implications of technology; Societies; Surveillance;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Technology and Society (ISTAS), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Wollongong, NSW
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-7777-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514612
  • Filename
    5514612