DocumentCode
3091402
Title
Peer-review: Overconfidence bias in a conference setting
Author
Ruiz-Conde, Enar ; Jose Mas-Ruiz, Francisco ; Calderon-Martinez, Aurora
Author_Institution
Department of marketing, University of Alicante, Spain
fYear
2013
fDate
17-19 July 2013
Firstpage
800
Lastpage
802
Abstract
The present study examines whether overconfidence bias is moderated by the type of manuscript submitted to conferences. The preliminary results suggest that the type of manuscript reviewed by the reviewer, either work in progress or completed work, makes overconfidence bias in peer-reviews of conference papers more or less visible due to potential bias against work in progress.
Keywords
Economics; Educational institutions; Focusing; Stress; Systematics; Technological innovation; Vehicles; Overconfidence bias; conference; peer-review; work in progress;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), 2013 10th International Conference on
Conference_Location
Hong Kong, China
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-4434-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602578
Filename
6602578
Link To Document