DocumentCode :
3092152
Title :
The abnormality predicate
Author :
Neufeld, Eric
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Saskatchewan Univ., Saskatoon, Sask., Canada
fYear :
1991
fDate :
26-29 May 1991
Firstpage :
218
Lastpage :
224
Abstract :
The author has suggested earlier that the various nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms are converging towards probability. Here, he discusses the idea of randomness: using a definition by Kyburg as a benchmark, he describes how it appears in various nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms, in particular, circumscription. It is argued that behind the complexity of circumscription lie the simple notions of random sampling and statistically founded beliefs. The latter is implemented through a device known as the abnormality predicate which appears in various guises in the nonmonotonic reasoning literature. Another view of this study is that randomness provides a universal conjecture for nonmonotonic theories. Default theories can be interpreted as jumping to the conclusion that an entity is a random member of a certain class
Keywords :
cognitive systems; formal logic; inference mechanisms; abnormality; circumscription; nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms; probability; randomness; tatistically founded beliefs; Artificial intelligence; Birds; Boats; Books; Bridges; Databases; Logic programming; Probability; Rivers; Statistics;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Multiple-Valued Logic, 1991., Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Victoria, BC
Print_ISBN :
0-8186-2145-1
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ISMVL.1991.130733
Filename :
130733
Link To Document :
بازگشت