DocumentCode
3092152
Title
The abnormality predicate
Author
Neufeld, Eric
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Saskatchewan Univ., Saskatoon, Sask., Canada
fYear
1991
fDate
26-29 May 1991
Firstpage
218
Lastpage
224
Abstract
The author has suggested earlier that the various nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms are converging towards probability. Here, he discusses the idea of randomness: using a definition by Kyburg as a benchmark, he describes how it appears in various nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms, in particular, circumscription. It is argued that behind the complexity of circumscription lie the simple notions of random sampling and statistically founded beliefs. The latter is implemented through a device known as the abnormality predicate which appears in various guises in the nonmonotonic reasoning literature. Another view of this study is that randomness provides a universal conjecture for nonmonotonic theories. Default theories can be interpreted as jumping to the conclusion that an entity is a random member of a certain class
Keywords
cognitive systems; formal logic; inference mechanisms; abnormality; circumscription; nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms; probability; randomness; tatistically founded beliefs; Artificial intelligence; Birds; Boats; Books; Bridges; Databases; Logic programming; Probability; Rivers; Statistics;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Multiple-Valued Logic, 1991., Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Symposium on
Conference_Location
Victoria, BC
Print_ISBN
0-8186-2145-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ISMVL.1991.130733
Filename
130733
Link To Document