• DocumentCode
    3092152
  • Title

    The abnormality predicate

  • Author

    Neufeld, Eric

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., Saskatchewan Univ., Saskatoon, Sask., Canada
  • fYear
    1991
  • fDate
    26-29 May 1991
  • Firstpage
    218
  • Lastpage
    224
  • Abstract
    The author has suggested earlier that the various nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms are converging towards probability. Here, he discusses the idea of randomness: using a definition by Kyburg as a benchmark, he describes how it appears in various nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms, in particular, circumscription. It is argued that behind the complexity of circumscription lie the simple notions of random sampling and statistically founded beliefs. The latter is implemented through a device known as the abnormality predicate which appears in various guises in the nonmonotonic reasoning literature. Another view of this study is that randomness provides a universal conjecture for nonmonotonic theories. Default theories can be interpreted as jumping to the conclusion that an entity is a random member of a certain class
  • Keywords
    cognitive systems; formal logic; inference mechanisms; abnormality; circumscription; nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms; probability; randomness; tatistically founded beliefs; Artificial intelligence; Birds; Boats; Books; Bridges; Databases; Logic programming; Probability; Rivers; Statistics;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Multiple-Valued Logic, 1991., Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Victoria, BC
  • Print_ISBN
    0-8186-2145-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISMVL.1991.130733
  • Filename
    130733