• DocumentCode
    3093840
  • Title

    Evaluation of a nonlinear simultaneous compressibility and mass density reconstruction algorithm in contrast to established linear ultrasound imaging approaches

  • Author

    Hesse, Markus C. ; Schmitz, Guido

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. of Med. Eng., Ruhr-Univ. Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    21-25 July 2013
  • Firstpage
    1444
  • Lastpage
    1447
  • Abstract
    While established linear pulse-echo ultrasound imaging concepts like synthetic aperture (SA) focusing and delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming solely image tissue features under single scattering, nonlinear reconstruction methods have been proposed to compute quantitative maps of the tissue´s material parameters (e.g. compressibility, mass density, speed of sound) under multiple scattering. In the present contribution, we apply a previously proposed nonlinear simultaneous compressibility and mass density reconstruction algorithm and investigate numerically the image reconstruction quality in contrast to linear SA under cylindrical wave (cw) excitation and linear DAS under plane wave (pw) excitation. Using raw data acquired from a Shepp-Logan phantom (SLP) with typical soft tissue compressibility and mass density values, nonlinear reconstruction using cylindrical wave excitation provides high-resolution images with a mean magnitude of relative error of about 4.27% and 3.18% within a region of interest (ROI) in the compressibility and mass density image, outperforming the image quality reached under plane wave excitation. Applying identical raw data, SA and DAS with both predefined and adapted apodization weights yield less-detailed image reconstructions solely showing tissue boundaries. Furthermore, calculating full width at half maximum (FWHM) resolutions of all methods, the nonlinear approach mainly yields smaller axial and lateral resolutions in contrast to SA and DAS.
  • Keywords
    array signal processing; biological tissues; biomechanics; biomedical ultrasonics; compressibility; edge detection; finite difference time-domain analysis; image reconstruction; image resolution; medical image processing; nonlinear equations; numerical analysis; phantoms; ultrasonic scattering; DAS beamforming; FWHM resolution calculation; Shepp-Logan phantom; apodization weight adaptation; apodization weight predefinition; axial resolutions; cylindrical wave excitation; delay-and-sum beamforming; full width at half maximum resolution calculation; high resolution images; image reconstruction quality; lateral resolutions; linear DAS; linear SA; linear pulse-echo ultrasound imaging concepts; linear ultrasound imaging approaches; mass density reconstruction algorithm evaluation; nonlinear reconstruction methods; nonlinear simultaneous compressibility algorithm evaluation; numerical analysis; plane wave excitation; quantitative tissue material parameter map computation; single ultrasonic scattering; sound speed; synthetic aperture focusing; tissue boundaries; tissue feature imaging; tissue mass density values; typical soft tissue compressibility; Image coding; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Imaging; Transducers; Ultrasonic imaging; Wires;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2013 IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Prague
  • ISSN
    1948-5719
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-5684-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ULTSYM.2013.0366
  • Filename
    6724907