DocumentCode :
3098012
Title :
Inter-operator variability in defining uterine position using three-dimensional ultrasound imaging
Author :
Baker, M. ; Jensen, John A. ; Behrens, Claus F.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Oncology(R), Herlev Hosp., Herlev, Denmark
fYear :
2013
fDate :
21-25 July 2013
Firstpage :
848
Lastpage :
851
Abstract :
In radiotherapy the treatment outcome of gynecological (GYN) cancer patients is crucially related to reproducibility of the actual uterine position. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inter-operator variability in addressing uterine position using a novel 3-D ultrasound (US) system. The study is initiated by US-scanning of a uterine phantom (CIRS 404, Universal Medical, Norwood, USA) by seven experienced US operators. The phantom represents a female pelvic region, containing a uterus, bladder and rectal landmarks readily definable in the acquired US-scans. The organs are subjected to displacement by applied operator-pressure that mimics an actual GYN patient. The transabdominal scanning was performed using a 3D-US system (Clarity® Model 310C00, Elekta, Montreal, Canada). It consists of a US acquisition-station, workstation, and a 128-element 1D array curved probe. The iterated US-scans were performed in four subsequent sessions (totally 21 US-scans) in a period of four weeks to investigate the randomness of the inter-operator variability. An additionally US-scan was performed as a reference target volume to the consecutive scans. At first, the phantom was marked with ball bearings for daily laser alignment. In each session the US-scans were acquired by the seven operators. The uterus was outlined in each of the US image-sets using Clarity autosegmentation in the workstation. Further, the shifts in the uterine centre of mass relative to the reference were measured for the three orthogonal directions; left (+)-right (LR), anterior (+)-posterior (AP), and inferior (+)-superior (IS), respectively. The same operator delineated the target volumes. The average inter-operator deviation ±1SD of the daily US scans was (in mm); LR: day 1 (-0.4±0.9), day 2 (-0.3±0.6), day 3 (-1.0±1.2), day 4 (1.3±0.5); AP: day 1 (0.0±1.7), day 2 (0.1±0.7), day 3 (-1.0±0.9), day 4 (0.2±1.2); IS:- day 1 (-1.5±2.6), day 2 (0.1±1.8), day 3 (0.1±1.1), day 4 (0.5±3.1), respectively. The largest inter-operator discordance was observed to be 4.7 mm in the IS-direction in day 4. Published studies report significantly larger inter-fractional uterine positional displacement, in some cases up to 20 mm, which outweighs the magnitude of current inter-operator variations. Thus, the current US-phantom-study suggests that the inter-operator variability in addressing uterine position is clinically irrelevant.
Keywords :
biological organs; biomedical ultrasonics; gynaecology; medical image processing; phantoms; radiation therapy; ultrasonic imaging; 128-element 1D array curved probe; 3D ultrasound system; Clarity Model 310C00; Clarity autosegmentation; actual uterine position; applied operator pressure; ball bearings; bladder landmarks; daily laser alignment; female pelvic region; gynecological cancer patients; interoperator discordance; interoperator variability; orthogonal directions; radiotherapy treatment; rectal landmarks; three-dimensional ultrasound imaging; time 1 d to 4 d; transabdominal scanning; ultrasonic acquisition station; uterine phantom; Bladder; Cancer; Computed tomography; Oncology; Phantoms; Probes; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2013 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Prague
ISSN :
1948-5719
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-5684-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ULTSYM.2013.0218
Filename :
6725112
Link To Document :
بازگشت