DocumentCode :
309953
Title :
To compress or not to compress?
Author :
Buch, Gabriele ; Burkert, Frank ; Hagenauer, Joachim ; Kukla, Bernhard
Author_Institution :
Tech. Univ. Munchen, Germany
fYear :
1996
fDate :
18-22 Nov 1996
Firstpage :
198
Lastpage :
203
Abstract :
For practical communications which transmit finite blocks of source data over noisy channels, we question the common practice to compress (C) the source and then to add redundancy for error control. Rather we exploit the redundancy of the non-compressed source (NC) at the channel decoder by source-controlled channel-decoding. For a simple binary Markov source and a Rayleigh fading channel we simulated in a fair comparison the 2 systems (C and NC) using an ARQ/FEC scheme with rate-compatible punctured convolutional (RCPC) codes, Lempel-Ziv compression and a modified Viterbi decoder. We indicate parameter regions where it is better not to compress
Keywords :
Markov processes; Rayleigh channels; Viterbi decoding; automatic repeat request; channel coding; convolutional codes; data compression; error correction codes; forward error correction; redundancy; source coding; ARQ/FEC scheme; Lempel-Ziv compression; RCPC codes; Rayleigh fading channel; binary Markov source; channel decoder; communications; error control; modified Viterbi decoder; noisy channels; non-compressed source; rate-compatible punctured convolutional codes; redundancy; source-controlled channel-decoding; Automatic repeat request; Channel coding; Data engineering; Decoding; Entropy; Forward error correction; Image coding; Image storage; Redundancy; Viterbi algorithm;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Global Telecommunications Conference, 1996. GLOBECOM '96. 'Communications: The Key to Global Prosperity
Conference_Location :
London
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-3336-5
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/GLOCOM.1996.586808
Filename :
586808
Link To Document :
بازگشت