• DocumentCode
    3100941
  • Title

    An Empirical Approach to Modeling Uncertainty in Intrusion Analysis

  • Author

    Ou, Xinming ; Rajagopalan, Siva Raj ; Sakthivelmurugan, Sakthiyuvaraja

  • Author_Institution
    Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    7-11 Dec. 2009
  • Firstpage
    494
  • Lastpage
    503
  • Abstract
    Uncertainty is an innate feature of intrusion analysis due to the limited views provided by system monitoring tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and various types of logs. Attackers are essentially invisible in cyber space and monitoring tools can only observe the symptoms or effects of malicious activities. When mingled with similar effects from normal or non-malicious activities they lead intrusion analysis to conclusions of varying confidence and high false positive/negative rates. This paper presents an empirical approach to the problem of uncertainty where the inferred security implications of low-level observations are captured in a simple logical language augmented with certainty tags. We have designed an automated reasoning process that enables us to combine multiple sources of system monitoring data and extract highly-confident attack traces from the numerous possible interpretations of low-level observations. We have developed our model empirically: the starting point was a true intrusion that happened on a campus network that we studied to capture the essence of the human reasoning process that led to conclusions about the attack. We then used a Datalog-like language to encode the model and a Prolog system to carry out the reasoning process. Our model and reasoning system reached the same conclusions as the human administrator on the question of which machines were certainly compromised. We then automatically generated the reasoning model needed for handling Snort alerts from the natural-language descriptions in the Snort rule repository, and developed a Snort add-on to analyze Snort alerts. Keeping the reasoning model unchanged, we applied our reasoning system to two third-party data sets and one production network. Our results showed that the reasoning model is effective on these data sets as well. We believe such an empirical approach has the potential of codifying the seemingly ad-hoc human reasoning of uncertain events, and can yield useful to- ols for automated intrusion analysis.
  • Keywords
    inference mechanisms; security of data; Datalog-like language; Prolog system; Snort add-on; Snort alerts; Snort rule repository; ad hoc human reasoning; automated intrusion analysis; automated reasoning process; intrusion detection system; logical language; malicious activities; natural language description; reasoning model; reasoning system; system monitoring data; system monitoring tools; uncertain events; uncertainty; Application software; Computer security; Computerized monitoring; Data mining; Data security; Forensics; Humans; Intrusion detection; Production systems; Uncertainty; intrusion detection; logic; uncertainty;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Computer Security Applications Conference, 2009. ACSAC '09. Annual
  • Conference_Location
    Honolulu, HI
  • ISSN
    1063-9527
  • Print_ISBN
    978-0-7695-3919-5
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ACSAC.2009.53
  • Filename
    5380706