DocumentCode
3125684
Title
Why a 120-credit engineering degree is now possible
Author
Archibald, Frank S.
Author_Institution
Pennsylvania State Univ., PA, USA
fYear
1993
fDate
6-9 Nov 1993
Firstpage
805
Abstract
It is suggested that, to achieve the imperative of a 120-credit degree with more relevance, two broad changes need to be made to the engineering undergraduate curriculum: exploit a major instructional paradigm shift now possible with the computer and organize the curriculum along three major instructional stems. The paradigm shift is from problem solving to problem definition. The second change leading to fewer courses is a curriculum structured around distinct instructional stems which are readily understood by students and instructional staff. These stems are: (1) design (for synthesis skills), (2) math/science/engineering (for analysis skills), and social/business (for societal relevance)
Keywords
educational courses; engineering education; 120-credit engineering degree; design; engineering undergraduate curriculum; instructional paradigm shift; synthesis skills; Application software; Computer aided instruction; Computer networks; Costs; Engineering students; Equations; Performance analysis; Problem-solving; Software packages; Software tools;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Frontiers in Education Conference, 1993. Twenty-Third Annual Conference. 'Engineering Education: Renewing America's Technology', Proceedings.
Conference_Location
Washington, DC
ISSN
0190-5848
Print_ISBN
0-7803-1482-4
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/FIE.1993.405411
Filename
405411
Link To Document