DocumentCode :
3132096
Title :
The comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control
Author :
Kunru, Ju ; Renjie, Zhang ; Danli, Xu
Author_Institution :
Inf. & Eng. Dept., TV Univ., Shanghai, China
Volume :
2
fYear :
2011
fDate :
20-21 Aug. 2011
Firstpage :
138
Lastpage :
141
Abstract :
The primary flight control system (PFCS) provides full time and full authority three axis, dynamic control law functions (pitch, roll and yaw) and non-dynamic control law functions (aileron droop, speed brake and ground lift dump). In addition, the PFCS calculates operational and limiting airspeed in order to provide full flight envelope protection across the entire flight envelope. PFCS provides limited gust alleviation function in the yaw axis. This paper provides a high level comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control (Pedal to Surface with Augmentation) versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control. Pedal to Surface versus Closed Loop design options have implications on a variety of factors including Human Factors, Gust Response, structural limiting requirements, asymmetric thrust response, and rudder trim.
Keywords :
aerospace control; closed loop systems; control system synthesis; closed loop design; closed loop yaw axis control; dynamic control law functions; primary flight control system; Acceleration; Aerospace control; Aircraft; Aircraft propulsion; Damping; Engines; Shock absorbers; Asymmetric thrust response; Closed Loop Yaw Axis Design; Conventional Yaw Axis Design; Gust Response; Rudder Trim;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering (CCIE), 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Wuhan
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-9599-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008086
Filename :
6008086
Link To Document :
بازگشت