DocumentCode :
3162712
Title :
Machine recognition vs human recognition of voices
Author :
Wenndt, Stanley J. ; Mitchell, Ronald L.
Author_Institution :
Air Force Res. Lab., Rome, NY, USA
fYear :
2012
fDate :
25-30 March 2012
Firstpage :
4245
Lastpage :
4248
Abstract :
While automated speaker recognition by machines can be quite good as seen in NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluations, performance can still suffer when the environmental conditions, emotions, or recording quality changes. This research examines how robust humans are compared to machine recognition for changing environments. Several data conditions including short sentences, frequency selective noise, and time-reversed speech are used to test the robustness of both humans and machine algorithms. Statistical significance tests were completed and, for most conditions, human were more robust.
Keywords :
speaker recognition; automated speaker recognition; environmental conditions; frequency selective noise; human recognition voice; machine recognition voice; time-reversed speech; Auditory system; Humans; Noise; Robustness; Speaker recognition; Speech; Speech recognition; Human Voice Recognition; Robust Speaker Identification; Speaker Familiarity;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2012 IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Kyoto
ISSN :
1520-6149
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-0045-2
Electronic_ISBN :
1520-6149
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288856
Filename :
6288856
Link To Document :
بازگشت