• DocumentCode
    3179926
  • Title

    Comparison of remote pressure and vibrotactile feedback for prosthetic hand control

  • Author

    Tejeiro, C. ; Stepp, Cara E. ; Malhotra, Manav ; Rombokas, Eric ; Matsuoka, Yasutaka

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Eng., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    24-27 June 2012
  • Firstpage
    521
  • Lastpage
    525
  • Abstract
    Prosthetic hand users may benefit from incorporation of sensory feedback, but the optimal methods of providing such feedback are still unknown. The effect on object manipulation of adding vibrotactile and pressure feedback at remote body sites to visual feedback was assessed in 8 participants using a virtual and robotic interface. Both pressure and vibrotactile feedback improved some aspects of task performance when compared to visual feedback alone; however, no difference in object manipulation performance was seen between pressure and vibrotactile feedback.
  • Keywords
    biocontrol; prosthetics; tactile sensors; object manipulation; optimal methods; pressure feedback; prosthetic hand control; remote body sites; remote pressure comparison; robotic interface; sensory feedback; vibrotactile feedback; virtual interface; Force; Prosthetic hand; Robot sensing systems; Vibrations; Virtual environments; Visualization; Upper limb prosthetics; pressure feedback; sensory substitution; vibrotactile feedback;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Rome
  • ISSN
    2155-1774
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-1199-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290268
  • Filename
    6290268